In Reply to: RE: Audiopax posted by Mike B. on December 11, 2009 at 14:29:36:
Actually this has been good.Turns out Eduardo was directed to look at this thread and he and I have been in contact today.
Looks like the rumors of the death of Audiopax are VERY premature, and simply not true.
Sure don't want to give wrong impression (which I probably had myself).
As I learn more I will post a basic up-to-date statement.
Best regards,
Jim Smith
Edits: 12/11/09
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Audiopax - Jim Smith 15:10:46 12/11/09 (8)
- RE: Audiopax - Eric B 19:00:48 12/11/09 (1)
- RE: Audiopax - Jim Smith 19:58:17 12/11/09 (0)
- Good news - Mike B. 17:21:10 12/11/09 (2)
- Audiopax service - Jim Smith 19:24:13 12/11/09 (1)
- Will do (nt) - Mike B. 08:52:31 12/12/09 (0)
- RE: Audiopax - Paul Joppa 16:58:56 12/11/09 (2)
- RE: Audiopax - Jim Smith 20:00:43 12/11/09 (1)
- RE: Audiopax - tube wrangler 16:04:39 12/14/09 (0)