If someone were to want to try single ended technolgy based on the wonderful things everyone says about the pure sound ... and I have no problem with going from 250 to three watts if they sound great ... what are some really good amps out there that might match with 89 sensitive Meadowlark Ospreys and cost less than, say, $3000? Or is that wishful thinking?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - New single ender - jokekajr 13:31:49 02/28/07 (16)
- Re: New single ender - SETdude 06:27:51 03/01/07 (0)
- Re: New single ender - jcmusic 05:31:35 03/01/07 (0)
- I second the start fresh - fin1bxn@msn.com 05:22:19 03/01/07 (0)
- Re: New single ender - coolhand 15:13:49 02/28/07 (9)
- The "89 dB " figure is a sensitivity figure, not an efficiency... - Thomas Martens 17:34:23 02/28/07 (7)
- Re: The "89 dB " figure is a sensitivity figure, not an efficiency... - coolhand 21:34:06 02/28/07 (0)
- Re: wha? - Matts_ 21:13:42 02/28/07 (5)
- Wrong. The standard definition of sensitivity when dealing with speaker output... - jeffreybehr 22:23:48 02/28/07 (4)
- Re: No such thing.... - Matts_ 10:55:09 03/01/07 (3)
- Do you really think I don't know the difference between resistance and impedance? It's YOU who... - jeffreybehr 13:42:28 03/01/07 (1)
- Re: there are NO industry standards.... - Matts_ 15:59:44 03/01/07 (0)
- Actually - Russ57 11:44:19 03/01/07 (0)
- The Previous post specified 45,2A3, 300B - had a link to another amp! (nt) - Cut-Throat 15:35:23 02/28/07 (0)
- Erm... you need really powerful tubes to drive those. - Gaspode 14:46:54 02/28/07 (1)
- I used these Explorer 805s to drive Quad 989s full range. They sounded great... - jeffreybehr 22:40:37 02/28/07 (0)
- New Speakers - Cut-Throat 14:02:37 02/28/07 (0)