In Reply to: It's the US dist. I'd bet posted by Ed Sawyer on December 18, 2004 at 08:10:21:
Do you say it's a $200 amp because that's what comparable gear sells for in the market? Is $200 a formula based on the parts cost, manufacturing cost, distribution cost, and reasonable profit? What's the frame of reference for "it's a $200 amp"?I think what you are calling shills might just be people who are excited to try SETS but can't take a big dollar plunge. The ferocity of some killjoys on this site is startling (I don't mean you Ed).
Maybe it's just a $200 300B set. Well, what's so wrong with that I guess is my question? It's a fun change from solid state. Maybe it captures a fraction of what the big dollar SETs deliver for a fraction of the dollars. As long as those fractions aren't too out of whack - what is wrong with it?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: It's the US dist. I'd bet - dozer 11:12:43 12/18/04 (1)
- thoguhts - Ed Sawyer 12:06:09 12/18/04 (0)