Do you now deny you posted a sentence which tied together "model"..."fig B1"..."possibility of skin effect" ... - Tom Dawson

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Article "if the capacitor fits" - jneutron 07:14:09 05/28/04 (161)

A Link to the Audio Mag Article. - Robert Hamel 07:32:11 06/07/04 (29)

Re: A Link to the Audio Mag Article. - jneutron 08:12:49 06/07/04 (28)

Do you now deny you posted a sentence which tied together "model"..."fig B1"..."possibility of skin effect" ... - Tom Dawson 13:45:17 06/11/04 (6)

Re: Do you now deny you posted a sentence which tied together "model"..."fig B1"..."possibility of skin effect" ... - jneutron 14:01:43 06/11/04 (5)

Re: Do you now deny you posted a sentence which tied together "model"..."fig B1"..."possibility of skin effect" ... - Tom Dawson 14:13:16 06/11/04 (4)

Hmmm..I see why we did not see eye to eye.. - jneutron 06:50:36 06/14/04 (0)

Do whatever you want! Personaly I have more faith in jneutron than that. nt! - Granholm 12:50:15 06/12/04 (2)

Re: Do whatever you want! Personaly I have more faith in jneutron than that. nt! - john curl 15:07:34 06/12/04 (1)

Hi John - jneutron 05:54:23 06/14/04 (0)

Re: A Link to the Audio Mag Article. - Tom Dawson 14:17:15 06/09/04 (20)

Re: A Link to the Audio Mag Article. - john curl 10:37:29 06/10/04 (1)

Hi John - jneutron 10:46:00 06/10/04 (0)

Re: A Link to the Audio Mag Article. - jneutron 09:27:15 06/10/04 (16)

"You bring an obvious attitude along with your erroneous statements." - self referential comment of the week by jneutron - Tom Dawson 13:35:55 06/11/04 (15)

Perhaps you should slow down and read the post again.. - jneutron 13:49:44 06/11/04 (14)

How could it be 'false' to point out your glaring errors, jneutron? nt - Tom Dawson 14:00:04 06/11/04 (3)

Re: How could it be 'false' to point out your glaring errors, jneutron? nt - jneutron 14:05:16 06/11/04 (2)

"you've only posted (jneutron's) errors on your own.." positing significant skin effect of a 2uF cap @ 20hz is an error - Tom Dawson 09:46:34 07/01/04 (1)

ummm, Tom? what are you talking about. - jneutron 12:30:44 07/02/04 (0)

Perhaps you should admit that you intended to suggest that skin effect should be considered... - Tom Dawson 13:56:17 06/11/04 (9)

Re: Perhaps you should admit that you intended to suggest that skin effect should be considered... - john curl 14:12:27 06/11/04 (1)

Hi John - jneutron 07:02:08 06/14/04 (0)

Re: Perhaps you should admit that you intended to suggest that skin effect should be considered... - jneutron 14:04:19 06/11/04 (6)

"nobody has a clue as to where it (skin effect) would present as an effect" - Speak for yourself, jneutron nt - Tom Dawson 09:49:52 07/01/04 (1)

Boy..you are working overtime, aren't you.. - jneutron 12:43:25 07/02/04 (0)

Re: Perhaps you should admit that you intended to suggest that skin effect should be considered... - john curl 14:21:05 06/11/04 (3)

Re: Perhaps you should admit that you intended to suggest that skin effect should be considered... - jneutron 06:56:27 06/14/04 (2)

Re: Perhaps you should admit that you intended to suggest that skin effect should be considered... - john curl 09:35:19 06/14/04 (1)

Re: Perhaps you should admit that you intended to suggest that skin effect should be considered... - jneutron 10:27:02 06/14/04 (0)

Re: A Link to the Audio Mag Article. - john curl 18:43:14 06/09/04 (0)

Here's a website with info... - Sean 23:12:47 06/05/04 (10)

OH, forgot to add this.. - jneutron 07:07:06 06/07/04 (0)

Re: Here's a website with info... - jneutron 05:58:03 06/07/04 (0)

Re: Here's a website with info... - Jon Risch 18:33:56 06/06/04 (7)

Re: Here's a website with info... - jneutron 06:14:36 06/07/04 (6)

Haven't seen any big boys here.... - Commuteman 10:39:21 06/07/04 (5)

Damn...ya had to call my bluff, didn't ya??nt - jneutron 10:59:26 06/07/04 (4)

Of course ;-) nt - Commuteman 12:15:24 06/07/04 (3)

Curse you red baron.. - jneutron 12:38:20 06/07/04 (2)

But seriously... (and late) - Commuteman 09:07:41 06/15/04 (1)

Late?...LATE???? - jneutron 13:58:38 06/15/04 (0)

Q3 - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 06:43:08 06/01/04 (1)

Re: Q3 - jneutron 07:50:10 06/01/04 (0)

Hmmmm... - Steve Eddy 09:35:26 05/29/04 (51)

Re: Hmmmm... - john curl 10:44:44 05/29/04 (50)

Re: Hmmmm... - Steve Eddy 13:00:29 05/29/04 (49)

Re: Hmmmm... - john curl 13:12:14 05/29/04 (48)

Re: Hmmmm... - Steve Eddy 19:11:55 05/29/04 (47)

Re: Hmmmm... - Sean 23:54:21 06/05/04 (46)

Re: Hmmmm... - Steve Eddy 13:17:17 06/07/04 (27)

Re: Hmmmm... - Sean 21:23:44 06/07/04 (26)

Re: Hmmmm... - Steve Eddy 23:05:53 06/07/04 (1)

Steve - jneutron 09:34:38 06/08/04 (0)

Re: Hmmmm... - john curl 22:22:04 06/07/04 (23)

I notice you haven't answered the questions.. - jneutron 09:18:27 06/08/04 (2)

Re: I notice you haven't answered the questions.. - john curl 01:04:51 06/09/04 (1)

Re: I notice you haven't answered the questions.. - jneutron 09:49:19 06/10/04 (0)

Re: Hmmmm... - Steve Eddy 23:13:48 06/07/04 (0)

Re: Hmmmm... - Sean 22:27:13 06/07/04 (18)

Walt Jung's website - Sean 22:31:28 06/07/04 (17)

Re: Walt Jung's website - john curl 00:33:51 06/08/04 (16)

Re: Walt Jung's website - Sean 20:54:52 06/08/04 (2)

Re: Walt Jung's website - john curl 08:31:17 06/09/04 (1)

I'm surprised that we haven't seen... - Sean 21:28:38 06/09/04 (0)

Re: Walt Jung's website - Steve Eddy 00:52:42 06/08/04 (12)

Re: Walt Jung's website - Tom Dawson 13:26:11 06/09/04 (11)

Re: Walt Jung's website - Steve Eddy 15:23:38 06/09/04 (10)

Re: Walt Jung's website - Tom Dawson 15:47:09 06/09/04 (9)

Re: Walt Jung's website - jneutron 10:30:40 06/10/04 (6)

Re: Walt Jung's website - Tom Dawson 13:53:31 06/11/04 (5)

Re: Walt Jung's website - jneutron 09:13:03 06/14/04 (0)

Re: Walt Jung's website - Steve Eddy 15:50:35 06/11/04 (3)

Stop confusing my world with facts!! ;o) nt! - Granholm 12:56:49 06/12/04 (2)

Thanks for the reminder! - Steve Eddy 19:28:03 06/12/04 (1)

Looking forward to receive it ;o) nt! - Granholm 13:22:58 06/13/04 (0)

Re: Walt Jung's website - Steve Eddy 17:38:17 06/09/04 (1)

Re: Walt Jung's website - Tom Dawson 13:46:27 07/01/04 (0)

Re: Hmmmm... - Phil Tower 09:09:58 06/06/04 (17)

Re: Hmmmm... - Tom Dawson 14:36:12 06/09/04 (1)

Re: Hmmmm... - jneutron 12:03:40 06/10/04 (0)

Re: Hmmmm... - Sean 11:04:14 06/06/04 (0)

Re: Hmmmm... - john curl 10:09:52 06/06/04 (13)

Re: Hmmmm... - john curl 14:26:12 06/06/04 (12)

Re: Hmmmm... - Steve Eddy 13:42:24 06/07/04 (11)

Re: Hmmmm... - Tom Dawson 13:44:42 06/09/04 (10)

Re: Hmmmm... - Steve Eddy 15:34:11 06/09/04 (9)

Re: Hmmmm... - Tom Dawson 15:55:56 06/09/04 (8)

Re: Hmmmm... - john curl 10:44:03 06/10/04 (1)

Re: Hmmmm... - jneutron 10:50:32 06/10/04 (0)

Re: Hmmmm... - jneutron 09:58:03 06/10/04 (0)

Re: Hmmmm... - john curl 18:39:25 06/09/04 (0)

Re: Hmmmm... - Steve Eddy 17:36:05 06/09/04 (3)

Re: Hmmmm... - Tom Dawson 09:36:43 07/01/04 (1)

Re: Hmmmm... - jneutron 13:45:09 07/02/04 (0)

steve, he did get ya...you should have been more specific, - jneutron 09:43:27 06/10/04 (0)

Re: Article "if the capacitor fits" - john curl 23:51:18 05/28/04 (5)

Well, you answered two anyway...and part of a third.. - jneutron 07:40:51 06/01/04 (4)

Re: Well, you answered two anyway...and part of a third.. - john curl 08:53:42 06/01/04 (3)

I note with interest, you still didn't answer the questions.. - jneutron 13:35:18 06/01/04 (2)

Re: I note with interest, you still didn't answer the questions.. - john curl 20:01:05 06/01/04 (1)

Well, a little more tempered response, at least.. - jneutron 06:27:55 06/02/04 (0)

Re: Article "if the capacitor fits" - john curl 10:05:28 05/28/04 (59)

BTW..those are just the simple "check of methods" questions. - jneutron 10:27:41 05/28/04 (6)

Re: BTW..those are just the simple "check of methods" questions. - john curl 13:04:09 05/29/04 (1)

I did read the article carefully. - jneutron 06:25:25 06/01/04 (0)

Re: BTW..those are just the simple "check of methods" questions. - john curl 11:59:30 05/28/04 (3)

Re: BTW..those are just the simple "check of methods" questions. - jneutron 12:51:01 05/28/04 (2)

Re: BTW..those are just the simple "check of methods" questions. - john curl 13:32:33 05/28/04 (1)

Re: BTW..those are just the simple "check of methods" questions. - jneutron 13:50:03 05/28/04 (0)

As I suspected..Walt did all the work, didn't he..you're just along for the ride.. - jneutron 10:17:15 05/28/04 (51)

That's real professional John - Jon Risch 22:36:08 05/28/04 (38)

Re: That's real professional John - Phil Tower 11:19:31 06/01/04 (1)

Re: That's real professional John - john curl 20:18:21 06/01/04 (0)

Figured you'd provide a BS response..I guessed right.. - jneutron 06:09:31 06/01/04 (35)

You and the other Naysayers are the Problem - Jon Risch 20:44:59 06/01/04 (30)

oh, btw..you are the only impediment to actual progress. - jneutron 10:42:53 06/02/04 (6)

Re: oh, btw..you are the only impediment to actual progress. - john curl 13:54:39 06/02/04 (5)

Re: oh, btw..you are the only impediment to actual progress. - Steve Eddy 14:16:36 06/02/04 (3)

Steve you are wrong! - Granholm 22:56:50 06/10/04 (2)

Re: Steve you are wrong! - john curl 23:17:39 06/10/04 (1)

hmmm - jneutron 06:10:18 06/11/04 (0)

Re: oh, btw..you are the only impediment to actual progress. - jneutron 13:59:21 06/02/04 (0)

Re: You and the other Naysayers are the Problem - Phil Tower 07:49:39 06/02/04 (0)

Did you just categorize yourself as a competent engineer???? - jneutron 06:12:38 06/02/04 (13)

Do not touch : "HIGH END AUDIO" - jensw 14:43:47 06/02/04 (10)

Re: Do not touch : "HIGH END AUDIO" - Phil Tower 08:30:13 06/03/04 (9)

Re: Do not touch : "HIGH END AUDIO" - john curl 08:02:45 06/04/04 (8)

Re: Do not touch : "HIGH END AUDIO" - Phil Tower 10:26:30 06/04/04 (7)

Re: Do not touch : "HIGH END AUDIO" - john curl 10:40:16 06/04/04 (5)

Re: Do not touch : "HIGH END AUDIO" - Phil Tower 11:19:12 06/04/04 (4)

Re: Do not touch : "HIGH END AUDIO" - john curl 12:09:42 06/04/04 (3)

Classic John Curl - Phil Tower 16:31:11 06/04/04 (2)

Re: Classic John Curl - john curl 17:54:10 06/04/04 (1)

Re: Classic John Curl - Phil Tower 18:24:10 06/04/04 (0)

Re: Do not touch : "HIGH END AUDIO" - john curl 10:36:41 06/04/04 (0)

Re: Did you just categorize yourself as a competent engineer???? - john curl 08:18:56 06/02/04 (1)

Re: Did you just categorize yourself as a competent engineer???? - jneutron 08:29:25 06/02/04 (0)

Re: You and the other Naysayers are the Problem - Steve Eddy 22:37:45 06/01/04 (7)

Re: You and the other Naysayers are the Problem - Jon Risch 17:17:01 06/02/04 (5)

Re: You and the other Naysayers are the Problem - Steve Eddy 18:22:13 06/02/04 (4)

Re: Now thats F--------ing funny:))) - 3fd 12:47:29 06/06/04 (0)

Typical childish behavior (nt) - Jon Risch 18:13:02 06/03/04 (0)

LOL nt. - Robert Hamel 15:30:08 06/03/04 (0)

Eine kleine frickmusik - E-Stat 05:20:45 06/03/04 (0)

Re: You and the other Naysayers are the Problem - john curl 01:49:37 06/02/04 (0)

Re: Figured you'd provide a BS response..I guessed right.. - john curl 09:32:44 06/01/04 (3)

Re: Figured you'd provide a BS response..I guessed right.. - jneutron 13:47:05 06/01/04 (2)

Re: Figured you'd provide a BS response..I guessed right.. - john curl 20:19:35 06/01/04 (1)

Hmmmm. - jneutron 07:20:11 06/02/04 (0)

Re: As I suspected..Walt did all the work, didn't he..you're just along for the ride.. - john curl 14:12:35 05/28/04 (3)

Re: As I suspected..Walt did all the work, didn't he..you're just along for the ride.. - Granholm 14:03:25 05/29/04 (2)

Re: As I suspected..Walt did all the work, didn't he..you're just along for the ride.. - john curl 09:29:43 05/30/04 (1)

decided to respond to your contentions here.. - jneutron 07:35:19 06/04/04 (0)

Yup... - Steve Eddy 10:32:08 05/28/04 (7)

unfortunately, cobbling circuits only goes so far. - jneutron 11:20:50 05/28/04 (6)

Re: unfortunately, cobbling circuits only goes so far. - Steve Eddy 12:12:49 05/28/04 (2)

Yah, I think you're right, Steve. - jneutron 12:56:26 05/28/04 (1)

This is like watching "Bumfights" (eom) - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 14:05:57 05/28/04 (0)

Re: unfortunately, cobbling circuits only goes so far. - Dan Banquer 11:31:31 05/28/04 (2)

Re: unfortunately, cobbling circuits only goes so far. - Steve Eddy 12:10:00 05/28/04 (1)

Re: unfortunately, cobbling circuits only goes so far. - Dan Banquer 12:27:31 05/28/04 (0)

Follow Ups

Do you now deny you posted a sentence which tied together "model"..."fig B1"..."possibility of skin effect" ... - Tom Dawson 13:45:17 06/11/04 (6)

Re: Do you now deny you posted a sentence which tied together "model"..."fig B1"..."possibility of skin effect" ... - jneutron 14:01:43 06/11/04 (5)

Re: Do you now deny you posted a sentence which tied together "model"..."fig B1"..."possibility of skin effect" ... - Tom Dawson 14:13:16 06/11/04 (4)

Hmmm..I see why we did not see eye to eye.. - jneutron 06:50:36 06/14/04 (0)

Do whatever you want! Personaly I have more faith in jneutron than that. nt! - Granholm 12:50:15 06/12/04 (2)

Re: Do whatever you want! Personaly I have more faith in jneutron than that. nt! - john curl 15:07:34 06/12/04 (1)

Hi John - jneutron 05:54:23 06/14/04 (0)