Re: Seebeck/peltier... - john curl - Propeller Head Plaza

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Objective Measurements to Compare Components Within a System - pburant 10:37:07 08/15/03 (138)

Look what you started! nt - clarkjohnsen 07:27:44 08/23/03 (1)

Started?...or continued? <nt> - pburant 07:52:28 08/26/03 (0)

Re: Objective Measurements to Compare Components Within a System - john curl 13:28:59 08/21/03 (131)

I think you're missing my point a bit..... - pburant 19:35:47 08/21/03 (130)

Re: I think you're missing my point a bit..... - jon_banquer@yahoo.com 20:00:14 08/24/03 (5)

Much as your point is to say, "You're wrong,"...... - pburant 08:09:55 08/26/03 (4)

Re: Much as your point is to say, "You're wrong,"...... - jon_banquer@yahoo.com 12:46:45 08/26/03 (3)

Re: Much as your point is to say, "You're wrong,"...... - pburant 05:23:57 08/27/03 (1)

Re: Much as your point is to say, "You're wrong,"...... - jon_banquer@yahoo.com 22:05:49 08/29/03 (0)

Re: Much as your point is to say, "You're wrong,"...... - jon_banquer@yahoo.com 15:55:05 08/26/03 (0)

You may have missed it... - Charles Hansen 19:45:04 08/21/03 (123)

And now I've seen them as well.... - Commuteman 09:47:10 08/22/03 (45)

Re: And now I've seen them as well.... - jneutron 09:58:50 08/22/03 (44)

Hey, we're agreeing! - Commuteman 10:12:15 08/22/03 (43)

Hee hee..we're jumpin thread to thread.. - jneutron 10:28:00 08/22/03 (42)

So maybe I can help the communication - Commuteman 11:20:15 08/22/03 (41)

Re: So maybe I can help the communication - john curl 15:30:28 08/22/03 (40)

Seebeck/peltier... - jneutron 19:24:11 08/22/03 (36)

Re: Seebeck/peltier... - john curl 23:21:43 08/22/03 (35)

Re: Seebeck/peltier... - jneutron 04:53:47 08/23/03 (34)

Re: Seebeck/peltier... - john curl 08:22:30 08/23/03 (33)

Re: Seebeck/peltier... - jneutron 09:01:31 08/23/03 (32)

Re: Seebeck/peltier... - john curl 09:54:43 08/23/03 (31)

Ah...deflection of any technical conversation..typical, John - jneutron 10:22:54 08/23/03 (30)

Re: Ah...deflection of any technical conversation..typical, John - john curl 13:06:57 08/23/03 (29)

Re: Ah...deflection of any technical conversation..typical, John - jneutron 16:29:53 08/23/03 (28)

Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - Commuteman 17:29:51 08/23/03 (27)

Re: Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - jneutron 12:54:34 08/24/03 (26)

Re: Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - john curl 15:37:42 08/24/03 (25)

Re: Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - jneutron 07:59:53 08/25/03 (24)

Can you stop arguing with JC and describe what you think might be happening? - Commuteman 09:09:25 08/25/03 (8)

Who's arguing? I'm being bashed for trying to explain. - jneutron 11:21:13 08/25/03 (7)

Are you sure you can use this Seebeck/Peltier cause and effect model? - Commuteman 12:18:56 08/25/03 (6)

I forgot to add.. - jneutron 17:20:41 08/25/03 (0)

I'll stick to this thread. - jneutron 12:31:19 08/25/03 (4)

Can we get to some ballpark numbers to see if it's significant? - Commuteman 13:41:47 08/25/03 (3)

You're killin me... - jneutron 15:56:18 08/25/03 (2)

I think we're using the same numbers.. - Commuteman 17:28:12 08/25/03 (1)

AHA!!!!! So that's where the error is... - jneutron 17:46:53 08/25/03 (0)

Re: Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - john curl 08:50:17 08/25/03 (14)

JC..you really have to read the posts.... - jneutron 10:29:16 08/25/03 (13)

Re: JC..you really have to read the posts.... - john curl 13:36:44 08/25/03 (10)

Hi John - jneutron 15:21:15 08/25/03 (9)

Re: Hi John - john curl 16:47:15 08/25/03 (8)

Re: Hi John - jneutron 17:04:43 08/25/03 (7)

Re: Hi John - john curl 20:16:24 08/25/03 (6)

Re: Hi John - jneutron 21:34:29 08/25/03 (5)

And BTW..You never did say who Dr. Van den Hul was.. - jneutron 21:48:10 08/25/03 (4)

Everyone is entitled to their opinion.... - Charles Hansen 22:03:03 08/25/03 (3)

Hmmm. - jneutron 05:41:31 08/26/03 (0)

Hellllooo Charles... - jneutron 03:45:13 08/26/03 (1)

OH, and Charles..... - jneutron 04:55:27 08/26/03 (0)

Peltier effects are reversible with current direction - Commuteman 11:43:41 08/25/03 (1)

AHA..gotcha - jneutron 11:58:44 08/25/03 (0)

Yep, my oscillator is now the problem - Commuteman 16:31:13 08/22/03 (2)

Re: Yep, my oscillator is now the problem - Dan Banquer 05:29:28 08/23/03 (1)

Thanks - Commuteman 09:59:43 08/23/03 (0)

Re: You may have missed it... - Dan Banquer 05:19:58 08/22/03 (2)

Speaking of "undefensible"... - Charles Hansen 11:08:19 08/22/03 (1)

Re: Speaking of "undefensible"... - Dan Banquer 11:44:44 08/22/03 (0)

You are correct... - pburant 04:41:26 08/22/03 (7)

Re: You are correct... - john curl 09:08:00 08/22/03 (6)

Hmmmm - jneutron 09:41:21 08/22/03 (5)

Have you ever measured a piece of audio equipment? - Commuteman 09:56:15 08/22/03 (4)

Sure...my RMX 1450 is 45 pounds in it's case.. - jneutron 10:21:06 08/22/03 (3)

And BTW.. - jneutron 10:39:56 08/22/03 (2)

Now that might help... - Commuteman 11:04:24 08/22/03 (1)

Thanks. - jneutron 14:00:15 08/22/03 (0)

Fuck you, Hansen nt - Steve Eddy 21:06:58 08/21/03 (65)

Releasing the rage of one too many "Ummm Bop's" ?? - slope 16:44:53 08/22/03 (0)

Re: Fuck you, Hansen nt - middleground 06:33:30 08/22/03 (62)

"significant advancements such as CD" There's your answer. - clarkjohnsen 08:24:19 08/22/03 (60)

Why are the comparisons always between CD & Vinyl? - pburant 12:22:29 08/22/03 (1)

You're right about the convenience - Commuteman 13:44:32 08/22/03 (0)

Re: "significant advancements such as CD" There's your answer. - Dan Banquer 09:41:23 08/22/03 (57)

But is recording technique getting better? - Commuteman 10:39:49 08/22/03 (56)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - Dan Banquer 11:42:17 08/22/03 (1)

Yep, there are some great recordings coming out - Commuteman 13:37:16 08/22/03 (0)

You are correct, sir, and to the point. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:27:38 08/22/03 (0)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - jneutron 10:46:40 08/22/03 (52)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - eico1 12:46:32 08/22/03 (29)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - jneutron 13:49:58 08/22/03 (28)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - Ted Smith 14:16:41 08/22/03 (27)

Hi Ted - jneutron 19:30:28 08/22/03 (1)

Re: Hi Ted - Ted Smith 20:48:26 08/22/03 (0)

Did we just go around in a cricle? - Commuteman 15:58:07 08/22/03 (24)

Re: Did we just go around in a cricle? - Ted Smith 20:59:05 08/22/03 (2)

Yep, I'm with ya - Commuteman 21:41:43 08/22/03 (1)

Re: Yep, I'm with ya - Ted Smith 22:01:13 08/22/03 (0)

Re: Did we just go around in a cricle? - jneutron 19:35:34 08/22/03 (20)

Re: Did we just go around in a cricle? - Ted Smith 20:52:47 08/22/03 (19)

Re: Did we just go around in a cricle? - jneutron 04:45:33 08/23/03 (18)

Re: Did we just go around in a cricle? - Ted Smith 04:48:34 08/23/03 (17)

Hi Ted. - jneutron 05:03:30 08/23/03 (16)

Re: Hi Ted. - Ted Smith 05:58:49 08/23/03 (0)

Re: Hi Ted. - Ted Smith 05:30:36 08/23/03 (0)

Re: Hi Ted. - Ted Smith 05:16:51 08/23/03 (13)

Re: Hi Ted. - jneutron 07:02:30 08/23/03 (12)

Re: Hi Ted. - Ted Smith 07:24:03 08/23/03 (11)

Code correction - Ted Smith 19:22:23 08/23/03 (0)

Re: Hi Ted. what you do??edit a typo? - jneutron 07:44:47 08/23/03 (9)

Re: Hi Ted. what you do??edit a typo? - Ted Smith 08:09:33 08/23/03 (8)

Re: Hi Ted. what you do??edit a typo? - jneutron 09:13:54 08/23/03 (7)

Re: Hi Ted. what you do??edit a typo? - Ted Smith 09:41:40 08/23/03 (6)

Re: Hi Ted. what you do??edit a typo? - jneutron 10:28:39 08/23/03 (5)

Re: Hi Ted. what you do??edit a typo? - Ted Smith 11:25:20 08/23/03 (4)

What's confusing to most people about this - Commuteman 17:37:13 08/23/03 (2)

Re: What's confusing to most people about this - Ted Smith 19:13:42 08/23/03 (1)

Re: What's confusing to most people about this - jneutron 07:47:01 08/25/03 (0)

Re: Hi Ted. what you do??edit a typo? - john curl 13:20:02 08/23/03 (0)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - Dan Banquer 11:37:43 08/22/03 (5)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - jneutron 11:55:59 08/22/03 (4)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - Dan Banquer 12:01:35 08/22/03 (3)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - jneutron 12:08:45 08/22/03 (2)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - Dan Banquer 12:27:04 08/22/03 (1)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - jneutron 12:33:45 08/22/03 (0)

you do know I was joking, right.....? - Commuteman 11:26:28 08/22/03 (1)

Yep..nt - jneutron 11:51:30 08/22/03 (0)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - mfc 11:05:58 08/22/03 (13)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - jneutron 11:13:26 08/22/03 (12)

This I do not understand.... - jensw 11:09:30 08/25/03 (6)

Re: This I do not understand.... - jneutron 13:23:36 08/25/03 (5)

Re: This I do not understand.... - jensw 14:29:23 08/25/03 (4)

The interesting connection - Commuteman 17:38:21 08/25/03 (1)

Re: The interesting connection - jneutron 18:38:17 08/25/03 (0)

Re: This I do not understand.... - jneutron 16:41:29 08/25/03 (1)

Let's leave it like this, here, way in and down. NT. - jensw 19:19:18 08/25/03 (0)

I like this explanation - Commuteman 14:19:04 08/22/03 (2)

Re: I like this explanation - john curl 16:00:27 08/22/03 (1)

Re: I like this explanation - jneutron 08:07:22 08/25/03 (0)

Re: But is recording technique getting better? - mfc 11:26:46 08/22/03 (1)

Now there's an interesting question.... - Commuteman 11:28:55 08/22/03 (0)

We're a small and difficult segment of the market - pburant 07:20:40 08/22/03 (0)

Wow! No foreplay - right down to business! <nt> - pburant 04:26:23 08/22/03 (0)

Flawed or not, this is frikkin' *complicated*. And to what end? - clarkjohnsen 07:50:19 08/20/03 (3)

Complicated? This is trivial compared to..... - pburant 07:12:08 08/21/03 (2)

Re: Complicated? This is trivial compared to..... - eico1 15:44:04 08/21/03 (1)

I like it! - pburant 08:37:54 08/22/03 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Seebeck/peltier... - john curl 23:21:43 08/22/03 (35)

Re: Seebeck/peltier... - jneutron 04:53:47 08/23/03 (34)

Re: Seebeck/peltier... - john curl 08:22:30 08/23/03 (33)

Re: Seebeck/peltier... - jneutron 09:01:31 08/23/03 (32)

Re: Seebeck/peltier... - john curl 09:54:43 08/23/03 (31)

Ah...deflection of any technical conversation..typical, John - jneutron 10:22:54 08/23/03 (30)

Re: Ah...deflection of any technical conversation..typical, John - john curl 13:06:57 08/23/03 (29)

Re: Ah...deflection of any technical conversation..typical, John - jneutron 16:29:53 08/23/03 (28)

Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - Commuteman 17:29:51 08/23/03 (27)

Re: Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - jneutron 12:54:34 08/24/03 (26)

Re: Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - john curl 15:37:42 08/24/03 (25)

Re: Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - jneutron 07:59:53 08/25/03 (24)

Can you stop arguing with JC and describe what you think might be happening? - Commuteman 09:09:25 08/25/03 (8)

Who's arguing? I'm being bashed for trying to explain. - jneutron 11:21:13 08/25/03 (7)

Are you sure you can use this Seebeck/Peltier cause and effect model? - Commuteman 12:18:56 08/25/03 (6)

I forgot to add.. - jneutron 17:20:41 08/25/03 (0)

I'll stick to this thread. - jneutron 12:31:19 08/25/03 (4)

Can we get to some ballpark numbers to see if it's significant? - Commuteman 13:41:47 08/25/03 (3)

You're killin me... - jneutron 15:56:18 08/25/03 (2)

I think we're using the same numbers.. - Commuteman 17:28:12 08/25/03 (1)

AHA!!!!! So that's where the error is... - jneutron 17:46:53 08/25/03 (0)

Re: Ok, so can you explain how these thermal effects might manifest themselves? - john curl 08:50:17 08/25/03 (14)

JC..you really have to read the posts.... - jneutron 10:29:16 08/25/03 (13)

Re: JC..you really have to read the posts.... - john curl 13:36:44 08/25/03 (10)

Hi John - jneutron 15:21:15 08/25/03 (9)

Re: Hi John - john curl 16:47:15 08/25/03 (8)

Re: Hi John - jneutron 17:04:43 08/25/03 (7)

Re: Hi John - john curl 20:16:24 08/25/03 (6)

Re: Hi John - jneutron 21:34:29 08/25/03 (5)

And BTW..You never did say who Dr. Van den Hul was.. - jneutron 21:48:10 08/25/03 (4)

Everyone is entitled to their opinion.... - Charles Hansen 22:03:03 08/25/03 (3)

Hmmm. - jneutron 05:41:31 08/26/03 (0)

Hellllooo Charles... - jneutron 03:45:13 08/26/03 (1)

OH, and Charles..... - jneutron 04:55:27 08/26/03 (0)

Peltier effects are reversible with current direction - Commuteman 11:43:41 08/25/03 (1)

AHA..gotcha - jneutron 11:58:44 08/25/03 (0)