In Reply to: It's pretty amusing to watch c-93 misuse the English language. posted by Pat D on June 29, 2010 at 14:15:21:
Once past that English critique, what was the point of your reply? Could it have been a modified "tu quoque" argument? Or just a straight ad hominem?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Did you write that? It's terrible English. - robert young 15:09:41 06/30/10 (36)
- Since you haven't followed the discussion . . . - Pat D 18:36:02 06/30/10 (35)
- So you can somehow tell what posts I read? - robert young 04:26:00 07/01/10 (12)
- RE: So you can somehow tell what posts I read? - Pat D 07:34:24 07/01/10 (11)
- You're lost in translation, Pat. - robert young 13:03:40 07/01/10 (4)
- So where was c93 "spot on?" - Pat D 16:24:12 07/01/10 (3)
- Umm, he got two out of three. You identified the one, so the answer must be the other two. - robert young 09:43:59 07/02/10 (2)
- RE: Umm, he got two out of three. You identified the one, so the answer must be the other two. - Pat D 10:45:01 07/02/10 (1)
- It is geting worse for you. But it IS amusing to witness. - robert young 14:42:27 07/02/10 (0)
- You're still not being very clear - E-Stat 08:27:38 07/01/10 (5)
- Center channel. - Pat D 10:37:12 07/01/10 (4)
- You chose to NOT answer my question - E-Stat 10:51:26 07/01/10 (3)
- If you want Sean Olive's opinion, ask him. - Pat D 12:29:29 07/01/10 (2)
- Curious backpeddling - E-Stat 12:37:40 07/01/10 (1)
- Not me. - Pat D 12:48:10 07/01/10 (0)
- RE: Since you haven't followed the discussion . . . - Tony Lauck 19:30:35 06/30/10 (21)
- RE: Since you haven't followed the discussion . . . - Pat D 07:31:22 07/01/10 (20)
- RE: Since you haven't followed the discussion . . . - Tony Lauck 08:07:05 07/01/10 (19)
- Nonsense. - Pat D 10:17:16 07/01/10 (18)
- Please stop embarrassing yourself. - robert young 13:14:01 07/01/10 (2)
- Why don't you read the whole text for context? - Pat D 14:14:18 07/01/10 (1)
- I did, and many here have, and you're still wrong... - robert young 04:47:58 07/02/10 (0)
- I decline to take a third dip in your pool of confusion. nt - Tony Lauck 12:01:16 07/01/10 (14)
- You're the one confused. - Pat D 01:53:07 07/02/10 (13)
- Read Olive's quote again Pat: the system is not a specific one. - robert young 05:39:22 07/02/10 (12)
- Changes nothing relevant. - Pat D 08:39:14 07/02/10 (8)
- But I didn't atack Sean, I attacked your interpretation of what he wrote. - robert young 09:29:27 07/02/10 (7)
- I never said *you* did. - Pat D 10:32:02 07/02/10 (6)
- RE: I never said *you* did. - robert young 20:05:03 07/02/10 (5)
- What I did in concurring with C93's observation - E-Stat 07:49:54 07/03/10 (4)
- It's is - if he's your idol, that you worship, and are never allowed to question. N/T - carcass93 08:28:06 07/03/10 (3)
- Naw, you're my idol (nt) - Pat D 16:10:01 07/03/10 (2)
- Is that the "whether you mean it or not" part of Flanders & Swan? :) - kerr 05:10:07 07/04/10 (1)
- RE: Is that the "whether you mean it or not" part of Flanders & Swan? :) - Pat D 17:34:34 07/04/10 (0)
- RE: Read Olive's quote again Pat: the system is not a specific one. - Tony Lauck 07:08:17 07/02/10 (2)
- RE: HA - rick_m 08:46:17 07/04/10 (0)
- "why HA continues to exist" - it's a social club, that just happens... - carcass93 18:34:47 07/02/10 (0)