In Reply to: OK... how about a test in linked HA thread - is that also advancing "science"? posted by carcass93 on June 28, 2010 at 09:10:02:
carcass93
"Take note - they are tested not for FR or any other irregularities"
You should actually check this. They would not have been able to determine whether the measured results correlated with the listener preferences--and they did! Maybe you should check them out on the link below. I'll make it easy for you: click on Slide 28.
Now, when you do subjective preference tests, the results will tell you, in your own words, "what sounds better subjectively, for listener's preferences in other words."
It's the same with testing in mono vs. testing in stereo. Sean Olive and Floyd Toole are among the world's greatest experts on the subject of speaker testing. According to them, mono testing works better.
In your remarks about your original post, you mention "supposed deficiencies of stereo reproduction," without listing them clearly.
-For example, there is no center channel in two channel stereo, period, so the writer is obviously correct.
-As to comparisons of width of sweet spots, I haven't heard his multi-channel system, so I cannot speak from my own experience which is better, though that potential exists with multi-channel. For that matter, you don't profess to have heard his system, either.
-The same goes for the sense of "a sense of envelopment and spaciousness" with his system vs. two channel stereo. You haven't heard his system, either.
carcass93
"would you call the person who made those arguments QUALIFIED to talk on the subject of high-quality sound reproduction?"
I'm pretty sure he's more qualified than you are since you don't even seem to understand he said. The quotation in your first post is hardly sufficient to judge how much the author "QUALIFIED to talk on the subject of high-quality sound reproduction?" However, what he says seems to me to correct.
His overall qualifications in that field depend on those things you consider to be straying, that is, Sean Olive's "credentials and body of work," both of which are beyond reproach.
-----
"A fool and his money are soon parted." --- Thomas Tusser
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- LOL! You should get your facts straight . . . - Pat D 10:53:54 06/28/10 (21)
- I love when somebody like you takes exception - helps everybody to see your depth,... - carcass93 11:21:18 06/28/10 (20)
- I should correct you on your logic, too. - Pat D 20:31:11 07/02/10 (18)
- Why did you post a link to jj's bio? - robert young 09:14:39 07/03/10 (15)
- RE: Why did you post a link to jj's bio? - Tony Lauck 07:24:46 07/05/10 (7)
- Mellowed? I would hope so - E-Stat 09:08:29 07/05/10 (1)
- Nothing has changed in the 4 years since... - robert young 11:40:32 07/05/10 (0)
- He acts like it wasn't his responsibility... - robert young 07:32:44 07/05/10 (4)
- RE: He acts like it wasn't his responsibility... - Pat D 10:34:44 07/05/10 (3)
- RE: He acts like it wasn't his responsibility... - robert young 05:09:10 07/06/10 (2)
- His posts tended to be lossy, too. :) -nt - E-Stat 10:45:35 07/06/10 (1)
- If he were here, he'd demand an immediate apology for your inflammatory post :) (nt) - kerr 09:18:38 07/09/10 (0)
- RE: Why did you post a link to jj's bio? - Pat D 17:32:22 07/04/10 (4)
- "not know who jj is" - yeah... like that's possible. - carcass93 08:00:44 07/05/10 (0)
- No "problem with that." - robert young 05:04:23 07/05/10 (2)
- RE: No "problem with that." - Pat D 10:32:34 07/05/10 (1)
- Missed my own typo! - robert young 05:10:19 07/06/10 (0)
- I, too, posted a jj link! - Tony Lauck 14:31:35 07/03/10 (1)
- I'd be worried about you too... - robert young 15:20:47 07/03/10 (0)
- Who are the Grand Inquisitors? - Tony Lauck 07:45:32 07/03/10 (1)
- {Ego meets Cognitive dissonance} "I heard you twice the first time" ~NT - Cleantimestream 08:02:27 07/14/10 (0)
- Have you compared Sean Olive's multi-channel system with stereo? - Pat D 12:01:15 06/28/10 (0)