In Reply to: So, you are more of a commentator than reviewer? posted by rp1@surfnetusa.com on April 10, 2007 at 23:31:29:
>I am not a fervent objectivist, I have feet in both worlds.But are they firmly on the ground?...
>The operative phrase is "too much" talk of tweaks and so on...too much is, of course, a nebulous value becuase I dont know the exact amount it takes. As in I don't know the exact amount of straw that will break the donkey's back, but do know that too much will do it.
You might try... not reading it...
>Cool, can you talk of your projects or are they NDA'd?
Partly. I have some open source info. If you're intrigued, by all means write me. clarkjohnsen at gmail.com
>I read your link; you sure are hard on the desingers...does that include Curl? Lamm? Pass? Hansen? Yourself?
We know who we are...
>I know the previous engineering posters were high end engineers/designers since this is an audiophile website, but....where are those working engineers now?
Uh... working?...
>LED's on the wall would come, imho, under the rubic of Tweak, as that is not an element that, say , an amp designer could include in his product.
Funny guy! Guess you're not acquainted with Edge...
Besides, how could LEDs on a wall be part of an amp anyway?
>The LED's can be well and truly discussed on the many other forums on AA devoted to such things,
Such as...? (Name three of the "many".)
>and I might be convinced to try it based on good postings.
Or, let's face it, more likely, not.
>Actually, I can prove that good interior decorating can vastly improve the emotional sound of your system.
For myself it's all in the lighting.
>Give Me Ambiguity or Give Me Something Else!
I dunno...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You got it! - clarkjohnsen 12:08:55 04/11/07 (0)