In Reply to: Science and Speculation posted by Jim Austin on March 23, 2007 at 08:20:01:
I'd wager there has been a lot of good science published without peer review...maybe not recently, but surely this is not the (or even a) primary distinction between the two.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Science and Speculation - TomLarson 12:40:41 03/26/07 (4)
- The tradition of peer review... - Jim Austin 13:07:29 03/26/07 (3)
- Re: The tradition of peer review... - TomLarson 19:14:01 03/27/07 (2)
- Well okay, sort of... - Jim Austin 04:29:09 03/28/07 (0)
- Re: The tradition of peer review... - morricab 04:23:21 03/28/07 (0)