Proof? Who needs that? We'll just believe it because it sounds good (NT) - tunenut

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - David Bohm: The Holographic Universe - geoffkait 07:05:37 03/23/07 (62)

This guy's a nut case! - The Real Dick Hertz 12:35:30 03/23/07 (3)

Re: Thus spake The Real Dick Hertz. nt - geoffkait 13:54:08 03/23/07 (2)

Unreal! nt - clarkjohnsen 11:56:42 03/24/07 (1)

Re: Bless their pointed little heads. nt - geoffkait 14:12:31 03/24/07 (0)

Evidence of something - tomservo 11:12:53 03/23/07 (7)

Re: Interesting. Looks like PEAR evolved into: - geoffkait 11:25:22 03/23/07 (5)

Good gotcha. And now, look at *this* prospectus: - clarkjohnsen 11:45:07 03/23/07 (4)

Re: look at *this* prospectus: sign up now! - tomservo 12:23:56 03/23/07 (1)

"...they will have earned the right to be taken seriously." In what circles? - clarkjohnsen 12:38:01 03/23/07 (0)

Re: Just a tad mundane. Have you seen what these guys are into? - geoffkait 12:17:39 03/23/07 (1)

Huh! Last night I read Kurzweil's The Singularity Is Near (as padded a book as ever I've seen) but... - clarkjohnsen 12:33:13 03/23/07 (0)

Is there a connection... - Jim Austin 11:21:16 03/23/07 (0)

"Undivided Wholeness in Flowing Movement." I like that! But where's the proof, huh, huh? nt - clarkjohnsen 10:46:12 03/23/07 (10)

Re: "Undivided Wholeness in Flowing Movement." - andy_c 18:43:26 03/23/07 (0)

Proof? Who needs that? We'll just believe it because it sounds good (NT) - tunenut 12:24:16 03/23/07 (6)

I can live with that personally... - Wellfed 12:52:17 03/23/07 (5)

The only proof one should need, is one's own satisfaction. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:29:08 03/26/07 (0)

Me Too! - thetubeguy1954 14:06:25 03/23/07 (0)

I did intend the audio meaning - tunenut 13:41:38 03/23/07 (2)

Yeah, it seems the whole standard of proof thing... - Wellfed 15:53:50 03/23/07 (1)

Re: Yeah, it seems the whole standard of proof thing... - tunenut 17:32:40 03/23/07 (0)

Re: Oh, that. I suspect it's still in peer review. nt - geoffkait 11:10:22 03/23/07 (1)

Yuck, yuck! - Jim Austin 11:19:47 03/23/07 (0)

Damn, wish I had one of those dripless teapots. nt - markrohr 09:33:57 03/23/07 (2)

Or a Wireless Power Cord..... - Todd Krieger 17:02:40 03/24/07 (1)

You might try sending a note to Nicola Tesla ! (nt) - Bambi B 06:51:08 03/25/07 (0)

David Pratt - Jim Austin 07:37:57 03/23/07 (35)

Re: David Pratt - Posy Rorer 22:09:47 03/28/07 (0)

Thnx Jim for saving us all from too much time wasting -nt - chris_w 00:47:06 03/27/07 (1)

Re: Some people need the... - geoffkait 05:31:22 03/27/07 (0)

Re: David Pratt - bjh 08:48:07 03/23/07 (1)

Re: David Pratt - Jim Austin 09:22:20 03/23/07 (0)

Forgot this... - Jim Austin 08:05:57 03/23/07 (1)

Re: Forgot this... - geoffkait 08:31:59 03/23/07 (0)

Re: David Pratt - geoffkait 07:59:16 03/23/07 (27)

At the risk of stating the obvious... - Jim Austin 08:11:44 03/23/07 (26)

Re: At the risk of stating the obvious... - geoffkait 08:17:51 03/23/07 (25)

Science and Speculation - Jim Austin 08:20:01 03/23/07 (24)

Re: Science and Speculation - May Belt 09:27:10 03/27/07 (18)

"Of course things have eventually to be proved to the satisfaction of the majority of people" - tunenut 13:12:50 03/27/07 (4)

Re: "Of course things have eventually to be proved to the satisfaction of the majority of people" - May Belt 01:50:26 03/28/07 (3)

I would be interested to read descriptions of the blind tests and results - tunenut 06:03:19 03/28/07 (2)

Re: I would be interested to read descriptions of the blind tests and results - May Belt 12:07:38 03/28/07 (1)

thank you for your response - tunenut 14:22:03 03/28/07 (0)

Re: Science and Speculation - john curl 11:55:04 03/27/07 (4)

Re: Science and Speculation - morricab 05:46:46 03/30/07 (2)

Re: Science and Speculation - john curl 14:20:35 03/30/07 (1)

Re: Science and Speculation - morricab 08:51:59 04/02/07 (0)

Re: Science and Speculation - Jim Austin 13:10:18 03/27/07 (0)

Tiresome - Jim Austin 11:06:25 03/27/07 (7)

Re: "Snake oil cancer (and audio?) remedies" - geoffkait 12:16:57 03/27/07 (6)

Re: "Snake oil cancer (and audio?) remedies" - Jim Austin 12:42:57 03/27/07 (5)

Re: "Snake oil cancer (and audio?) remedies" - Posy Rorer 18:32:35 03/27/07 (0)

Re: "Snake oil cancer (and audio?) remedies" - geoffkait 14:04:46 03/27/07 (3)

Re: "Snake oil cancer (and audio?) remedies" - Jim Austin 14:39:57 03/27/07 (2)

Re: "your attempts to drum up outrage" - geoffkait 16:22:58 03/27/07 (1)

Re: "your attempts to drum up outrage" - Jim Austin 17:38:11 03/27/07 (0)

Re: Science and Speculation - TomLarson 12:40:41 03/26/07 (4)

The tradition of peer review... - Jim Austin 13:07:29 03/26/07 (3)

Re: The tradition of peer review... - TomLarson 19:14:01 03/27/07 (2)

Well okay, sort of... - Jim Austin 04:29:09 03/28/07 (0)

Re: The tradition of peer review... - morricab 04:23:21 03/28/07 (0)

Follow Ups

Proof? Who needs that? We'll just believe it because it sounds good (NT) - tunenut 12:24:16 03/23/07 (6)

I can live with that personally... - Wellfed 12:52:17 03/23/07 (5)

The only proof one should need, is one's own satisfaction. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:29:08 03/26/07 (0)

Me Too! - thetubeguy1954 14:06:25 03/23/07 (0)

I did intend the audio meaning - tunenut 13:41:38 03/23/07 (2)

Yeah, it seems the whole standard of proof thing... - Wellfed 15:53:50 03/23/07 (1)

Re: Yeah, it seems the whole standard of proof thing... - tunenut 17:32:40 03/23/07 (0)