In Reply to: David Pratt posted by Jim Austin on March 23, 2007 at 07:37:57:
David Pratt's Homepage.You'll see it contains quite an extraordinary assortment of stuff, including a laundry list of rationalizations for pretty much every paranormal trend, from ESP to crop circles to alien invasions.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - David Bohm: The Holographic Universe - geoffkait 07:05:37 03/23/07 (62)
- This guy's a nut case! - The Real Dick Hertz 12:35:30 03/23/07 (3)
- Re: Thus spake The Real Dick Hertz. nt - geoffkait 13:54:08 03/23/07 (2)
- Unreal! nt - clarkjohnsen 11:56:42 03/24/07 (1)
- Re: Bless their pointed little heads. nt - geoffkait 14:12:31 03/24/07 (0)
- Evidence of something - tomservo 11:12:53 03/23/07 (7)
- Re: Interesting. Looks like PEAR evolved into: - geoffkait 11:25:22 03/23/07 (5)
- Good gotcha. And now, look at *this* prospectus: - clarkjohnsen 11:45:07 03/23/07 (4)
- Re: look at *this* prospectus: sign up now! - tomservo 12:23:56 03/23/07 (1)
- "...they will have earned the right to be taken seriously." In what circles? - clarkjohnsen 12:38:01 03/23/07 (0)
- Re: Just a tad mundane. Have you seen what these guys are into? - geoffkait 12:17:39 03/23/07 (1)
- Huh! Last night I read Kurzweil's The Singularity Is Near (as padded a book as ever I've seen) but... - clarkjohnsen 12:33:13 03/23/07 (0)
- Is there a connection... - Jim Austin 11:21:16 03/23/07 (0)
- "Undivided Wholeness in Flowing Movement." I like that! But where's the proof, huh, huh? nt - clarkjohnsen 10:46:12 03/23/07 (10)
- Re: "Undivided Wholeness in Flowing Movement." - andy_c 18:43:26 03/23/07 (0)
- Proof? Who needs that? We'll just believe it because it sounds good (NT) - tunenut 12:24:16 03/23/07 (6)
- I can live with that personally... - Wellfed 12:52:17 03/23/07 (5)
- The only proof one should need, is one's own satisfaction. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:29:08 03/26/07 (0)
- Me Too! - thetubeguy1954 14:06:25 03/23/07 (0)
- I did intend the audio meaning - tunenut 13:41:38 03/23/07 (2)
- Yeah, it seems the whole standard of proof thing... - Wellfed 15:53:50 03/23/07 (1)
- Re: Yeah, it seems the whole standard of proof thing... - tunenut 17:32:40 03/23/07 (0)
- Re: Oh, that. I suspect it's still in peer review. nt - geoffkait 11:10:22 03/23/07 (1)
- Yuck, yuck! - Jim Austin 11:19:47 03/23/07 (0)
- Damn, wish I had one of those dripless teapots. nt - markrohr 09:33:57 03/23/07 (2)
- Or a Wireless Power Cord..... - Todd Krieger 17:02:40 03/24/07 (1)
- You might try sending a note to Nicola Tesla ! (nt) - Bambi B 06:51:08 03/25/07 (0)
- David Pratt - Jim Austin 07:37:57 03/23/07 (35)
- Re: David Pratt - Posy Rorer 22:09:47 03/28/07 (0)
- Thnx Jim for saving us all from too much time wasting -nt - chris_w 00:47:06 03/27/07 (1)
- Re: Some people need the... - geoffkait 05:31:22 03/27/07 (0)
- Re: David Pratt - bjh 08:48:07 03/23/07 (1)
- Re: David Pratt - Jim Austin 09:22:20 03/23/07 (0)
- Forgot this... - Jim Austin 08:05:57 03/23/07 (1)
- Re: Forgot this... - geoffkait 08:31:59 03/23/07 (0)
- Re: David Pratt - geoffkait 07:59:16 03/23/07 (27)
- At the risk of stating the obvious... - Jim Austin 08:11:44 03/23/07 (26)
- Re: At the risk of stating the obvious... - geoffkait 08:17:51 03/23/07 (25)
- Science and Speculation - Jim Austin 08:20:01 03/23/07 (24)
- Re: Science and Speculation - May Belt 09:27:10 03/27/07 (18)
- "Of course things have eventually to be proved to the satisfaction of the majority of people" - tunenut 13:12:50 03/27/07 (4)
- Re: "Of course things have eventually to be proved to the satisfaction of the majority of people" - May Belt 01:50:26 03/28/07 (3)
- I would be interested to read descriptions of the blind tests and results - tunenut 06:03:19 03/28/07 (2)
- Re: I would be interested to read descriptions of the blind tests and results - May Belt 12:07:38 03/28/07 (1)
- thank you for your response - tunenut 14:22:03 03/28/07 (0)
- Re: Science and Speculation - john curl 11:55:04 03/27/07 (4)
- Re: Science and Speculation - morricab 05:46:46 03/30/07 (2)
- Re: Science and Speculation - john curl 14:20:35 03/30/07 (1)
- Re: Science and Speculation - morricab 08:51:59 04/02/07 (0)
- Re: Science and Speculation - Jim Austin 13:10:18 03/27/07 (0)
- Tiresome - Jim Austin 11:06:25 03/27/07 (7)
- Re: "Snake oil cancer (and audio?) remedies" - geoffkait 12:16:57 03/27/07 (6)
- Re: "Snake oil cancer (and audio?) remedies" - Jim Austin 12:42:57 03/27/07 (5)
- Re: "Snake oil cancer (and audio?) remedies" - Posy Rorer 18:32:35 03/27/07 (0)
- Re: "Snake oil cancer (and audio?) remedies" - geoffkait 14:04:46 03/27/07 (3)
- Re: "Snake oil cancer (and audio?) remedies" - Jim Austin 14:39:57 03/27/07 (2)
- Re: "your attempts to drum up outrage" - geoffkait 16:22:58 03/27/07 (1)
- Re: "your attempts to drum up outrage" - Jim Austin 17:38:11 03/27/07 (0)
- Re: Science and Speculation - TomLarson 12:40:41 03/26/07 (4)
- The tradition of peer review... - Jim Austin 13:07:29 03/26/07 (3)
- Re: The tradition of peer review... - TomLarson 19:14:01 03/27/07 (2)
- Well okay, sort of... - Jim Austin 04:29:09 03/28/07 (0)
- Re: The tradition of peer review... - morricab 04:23:21 03/28/07 (0)
Follow Ups
- Forgot this... - Jim Austin 08:05:57 03/23/07 (1)
- Re: Forgot this... - geoffkait 08:31:59 03/23/07 (0)