In Reply to: Re: This is obfuscation posted by thetubeguy1954 on March 22, 2007 at 12:22:24:
In your own tests, in your own system, as you described them, are you hearing a particular quality to the sound that changes, differences in specific characteristics, or what? Is there a particular point in a particular recording where you can usually hear the difference?To me, this is really important. It's true, as JA (in the April Stereophile) and others contend, that the best way to evaluate the character and quality of a piece of equipment is to listen to it over time. But I think it's important for the credibility of our hobby that we be able to relate those qualitative changes to specific aspects of the sound that we can point to and say "see? that's different. It's the cymbals" or whatever. I'm not talking about relating it to something measured, but to something reliably and repeatably perceived. And, of course, it's important to be able to make a compelling case that we actually hear what we claim to hear--even if it's not lab-certified proof. (There's no such thing as a perfect experiment in science, and even good ones are hard to achieve. A lot of the work that moves science forward is good but imperfect, suggestive but not definitive.)
So--what do you listen for? Also, can you do this for any IC comparison? How many combinations have you tried?
Best,
Jim
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- What do you listen for? - Jim Austin 13:00:29 03/22/07 (13)
- Re: What do you listen for? - thetubeguy1954 14:02:48 03/23/07 (12)
- Re: What do you listen for? - Jim Austin 14:20:00 03/23/07 (11)
- Re: What do you listen for? - thetubeguy1954 09:12:47 03/27/07 (0)
- I must be a scientist of sorts... - Wellfed 07:37:34 03/24/07 (9)
- Re: I must be a scientist of sorts... - morricab 04:26:15 03/28/07 (8)
- I don't wish to be a "scientist"... - Wellfed 07:33:05 03/28/07 (7)
- Re: I don't wish to be a "scientist"... - morricab 18:05:35 03/28/07 (6)
- No, I meant merely this kind of scientist... - Wellfed 18:18:37 03/28/07 (5)
- Re: No, I meant merely this kind of scientist... - morricab 04:30:46 03/29/07 (4)
- Okay, okay, I don't want to burn up any more review time from my esteemed peers... - Wellfed 09:11:24 03/29/07 (3)
- Re: Okay, okay, I don't want to burn up any more review time from my esteemed peers... - john curl 16:37:14 03/29/07 (0)
- How do you derive your heading from the content? - clifff 13:36:58 03/29/07 (1)
- Re: How do you derive your heading from the content? - Wellfed 18:11:38 03/29/07 (0)