|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Boyk and Cheever papers shot down... posted by andy19191 on March 19, 2007 at 09:01:11:
"As far as real world devices are concerned the Boyk work is quite clear about what is compared, how and why. To shoot it down for something it does not claim to be seems unreasonable and has strong echoes of audiophile behaviour. To shoot it down because the details are incorrect is another matter but are the details incorrect?"Hmmm you are going off on a tangent, I said
"the models and some of the key assumptions that form the basis of each of these publications are not applicable real-world devices"
The issue of whether the scientific method is adopted by both papers or not is tangential to my point. If the model or the key assumptions that underscore a given model are invalid, how can the theory formed on the basis of the said model be valid?
Music making the painting, recording it the photograph
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Boyk and Cheever papers shot down... - theaudiohobby 09:26:00 03/19/07 (2)
- Re: Boyk and Cheever papers shot down... - andy19191 10:55:29 03/19/07 (0)
- Re: Boyk and Cheever papers shot down... - morricab 09:54:40 03/19/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
