In Reply to: Re: ...and your point is? posted by Dan Banquer on March 9, 2007 at 09:57:59:
sorry for offending.There is much that I don't know, but I'm learning all the time. The reason I liked that article, by the way, is not because there's anything in it that I thought was new, but because it was written from an engineering perspective but with respect for what other techy types deride as "audiophile values." It acknowledges from the beginning that high-performance audio is indeed high-performance, rather than acting as if a Circuit City CD player is as good as it gets.
I'm not saying it's new, only that it's uncommon in this world. So it's refreshing.
Best,
Jim
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Okay, I get it - Jim Austin 10:13:24 03/09/07 (10)
- Re: Okay, I get it - john curl 02:39:27 03/10/07 (7)
- I used Horowitz and Hill... - Jim Austin 03:41:36 03/10/07 (6)
- Re: I used Horowitz and Hill... - john curl 10:49:42 03/10/07 (5)
- This book looks interestin - Jim Austin 09:16:08 03/11/07 (1)
- Re: This book looks interestin - john curl 12:00:48 03/11/07 (0)
- Re: I used Horowitz and Hill... - Jim Austin 14:13:22 03/10/07 (2)
- Re: I used Horowitz and Hill... - john curl 17:10:23 03/10/07 (1)
- Re: I used Horowitz and Hill... - Jim Austin 18:16:43 03/10/07 (0)
- Re: Okay, I get it - Dan Banquer 10:23:18 03/09/07 (1)
- Maybe I shouldn't say this... - Jim Austin 10:33:23 03/09/07 (0)