In Reply to: Re: This interpretation is much too simple posted by Dan Banquer on March 9, 2007 at 09:14:30:
I mean, other than to say "I already knew all that. So what?"--which doesn't really seem to be on point.Cheers,
Jim
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- ...and your point is? - Jim Austin 09:25:43 03/09/07 (12)
- Re: ...and your point is? - Dan Banquer 09:57:59 03/09/07 (11)
- Okay, I get it - Jim Austin 10:13:24 03/09/07 (10)
- Re: Okay, I get it - john curl 02:39:27 03/10/07 (7)
- I used Horowitz and Hill... - Jim Austin 03:41:36 03/10/07 (6)
- Re: I used Horowitz and Hill... - john curl 10:49:42 03/10/07 (5)
- This book looks interestin - Jim Austin 09:16:08 03/11/07 (1)
- Re: This book looks interestin - john curl 12:00:48 03/11/07 (0)
- Re: I used Horowitz and Hill... - Jim Austin 14:13:22 03/10/07 (2)
- Re: I used Horowitz and Hill... - john curl 17:10:23 03/10/07 (1)
- Re: I used Horowitz and Hill... - Jim Austin 18:16:43 03/10/07 (0)
- Re: Okay, I get it - Dan Banquer 10:23:18 03/09/07 (1)
- Maybe I shouldn't say this... - Jim Austin 10:33:23 03/09/07 (0)