In Reply to: Re: Interesting article. Most of it is over my head but ... posted by Dan Banquer on March 9, 2007 at 04:27:45:
Once again you miss the point. The point is that it is LISTENING that pointed the way to the correct metrics and not the metrics that directly led to the good sound. Without the listening they would not have known that the result was anything less than "perfect". After all with their standard tests that is what they got, right? "Perfect"?As I have advocated for a long time now, the metrics must follow and correlate with the listening and not the other way around.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Interesting article. Most of it is over my head but ... - morricab 06:36:37 03/09/07 (72)
- Re: Interesting article. Most of it is over my head but ... - Dan Banquer 07:18:51 03/10/07 (67)
- Re: Interesting article. Most of it is over my head but ... - morricab 03:11:54 03/11/07 (66)
- Ingnorance abounds and your propaganda is baseless. - Dan Banquer 04:38:08 03/12/07 (38)
- Re: Ingnorance abounds and your propaganda is baseless. - morricab 08:02:40 03/12/07 (31)
- Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - andy_c 16:12:21 03/12/07 (21)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 13:58:39 03/14/07 (14)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - andy_c 16:52:57 03/14/07 (13)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 03:31:58 03/15/07 (5)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - andy_c 13:12:40 03/15/07 (3)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 17:45:44 03/15/07 (1)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - andy_c 20:23:42 03/15/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 15:11:57 03/15/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 11:17:07 03/15/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 19:50:02 03/14/07 (6)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 03:18:19 03/15/07 (1)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 11:40:53 03/15/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - andy_c 20:03:02 03/14/07 (3)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 00:07:08 03/15/07 (2)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 03:24:37 03/15/07 (1)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 11:14:47 03/15/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - theaudiohobby 19:02:02 03/13/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - john curl 02:30:31 03/13/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 16:55:55 03/12/07 (3)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - andy_c 17:08:55 03/12/07 (2)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 09:30:56 03/13/07 (0)
- Re: Regarding Boyk and Sussman, Cheever, etc. - morricab 03:04:23 03/13/07 (0)
- Clueless in Switzerland - Dan Banquer 08:25:57 03/12/07 (8)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - morricab 08:37:59 03/12/07 (7)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - Dan Banquer 09:00:33 03/12/07 (6)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - morricab 10:39:39 03/12/07 (5)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - Dan Banquer 10:54:55 03/12/07 (4)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - morricab 11:10:33 03/12/07 (3)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - Dan Banquer 11:32:12 03/12/07 (2)
- Re: Clueless in Switzerland - morricab 14:15:48 03/12/07 (1)
- If you want to stick your foot in your mouth........... - Dan Banquer 09:15:03 03/13/07 (1)
- P.S. - Dan Banquer 07:30:08 03/12/07 (5)
- Re: P.S. - morricab 08:33:11 03/12/07 (4)
- Re: P.S. - Dan Banquer 09:25:14 03/12/07 (3)
- Re: P.S. - morricab 11:00:47 03/12/07 (2)
- Bwahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! - Dan Banquer 12:55:39 03/12/07 (1)
- Re: Bwahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! - morricab 14:05:36 03/12/07 (0)
- For some reason, Dan prefers arguing to the wall about what he imagines - E-Stat 20:20:33 03/11/07 (26)
- I Imagine nothing. - Dan Banquer 04:40:09 03/12/07 (25)
- Right, Dan - E-Stat 06:19:20 03/12/07 (24)
- Yes I am right. - Dan Banquer 06:41:31 03/12/07 (23)
- You can't even remember what we're talking about! - E-Stat 06:55:55 03/12/07 (22)
- You have already demonstrated that you don't have a technical clue! - Dan Banquer 07:36:39 03/12/07 (21)
- Re: You have already demonstrated that you don't have a technical clue! - morricab 08:40:54 03/12/07 (5)
- Re: You have already demonstrated that you don't have a technical clue! - Dan Banquer 09:03:03 03/12/07 (4)
- Correction! - Dan Banquer 09:16:32 03/12/07 (3)
- Re: Correction! - morricab 11:15:48 03/12/07 (2)
- Re: Correction! - Dan Banquer 12:07:26 03/12/07 (1)
- Re: Correction! - morricab 14:46:45 03/12/07 (0)
- P.S. - Dan Banquer 08:22:42 03/12/07 (14)
- Cite your sources - E-Stat 09:58:46 03/12/07 (13)
- Re: Cite your sources - Dan Banquer 10:07:38 03/12/07 (12)
- Actually I find it pointless to debate your imagination - E-Stat 10:12:52 03/12/07 (11)
- Redundancy is not necessary, Redundancy is not necessary, & Redundancy is not necessary. nt - Dan Banquer 10:22:12 03/12/07 (10)
- Fine - E-Stat 10:25:07 03/12/07 (9)
- Re: Fine - Dan Banquer 10:40:36 03/12/07 (8)
- Sure - E-Stat 10:54:08 03/12/07 (7)
- Re: Sure - Dan Banquer 11:06:02 03/12/07 (5)
- You first - E-Stat 11:16:10 03/12/07 (4)
- Re: You first - Dan Banquer 11:26:37 03/12/07 (3)
- I can't take anyone seriously - E-Stat 11:32:26 03/12/07 (2)
- I'm learning :) - Dan Banquer 12:02:53 03/12/07 (1)
- The lack of substantiation for your claims so noted (nt) - E-Stat 12:28:45 03/12/07 (0)
- Re: Sure - Dan Banquer 10:57:57 03/12/07 (0)
- Hard to argue - Jim Austin 07:09:59 03/09/07 (3)
- Re: Hard to argue - john curl 01:12:06 03/10/07 (1)
- Sorry, I don't get your meaning - Jim Austin 03:39:58 03/10/07 (0)
- Re: Hard to argue - morricab 09:47:01 03/09/07 (0)