In Reply to: Ludicrous claims posted by kerr on February 25, 2007 at 16:33:35:
"Ludicrous claims are the basis of the rift between subjectivists and objectivists. An objectivist ludicrous claim, for example, would be Peter Aczel's claim that all amplifiers sound alike (with his impedances, not clipping, etc accounted for). Do you agree with his ludicrous claim?"Why do think the claim is ludicrous? I do not see it as ludricous because many amplifiers that genuinely sound different do not satisfy one or more of the criteria listed by Aczel. For example most if not all zero feedback amplifiers have high distortion and high output impedance, and as a result generally modify the behaviour of the partnering speaker .
Music making the painting, recording it the photograph
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Ludricous claims - theaudiohobby 16:52:09 02/25/07 (12)
- Re: Ludicrous claims - Ted Smith 17:21:03 02/25/07 (11)
- Re: Ludicrous claims - theaudiohobby 18:19:22 02/25/07 (10)
- Re: Ludicrous claims - Pat D 19:05:48 02/25/07 (9)
- Re: Ludicrous claims - Ted Smith 20:02:56 02/25/07 (0)
- Re: Ludicrous claims - theaudiohobby 19:23:48 02/25/07 (7)
- Re: Ludicrous claims - Ted Smith 21:16:32 02/25/07 (6)
- Re: Off-topic Moderation - theaudiohobby 10:01:43 02/26/07 (4)
- How would you define the posts AJ in FLA makes? - robert young 06:05:11 02/27/07 (2)
- Re: How would you define the posts AJ in FLA makes? - theaudiohobby 07:25:57 02/27/07 (1)
- Re: How would you define the posts AJ in FLA makes? - robert young 04:57:09 02/28/07 (0)
- Re: Off-topic Moderation - Ted Smith 12:00:04 02/26/07 (0)
- Re: Same old principle - theaudiohobby 01:26:47 02/26/07 (0)