A lot of pro recording people have tested DSD, 192kHz/24 bit and 44.1kHz/16 bit compared to a live mic signal - Ole Lund Christensen

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - This Engineering Publication Gets It Right..... - Todd Krieger 04:11:16 02/12/07 (63)

Wow does this sound familiar. As usual the answer why some hear improvements is that they are delusional. - Norm 20:42:24 02/14/07 (0)

maybe he gets it half right - tunenut 10:42:14 02/12/07 (10)

Good point. Next question: - Al Sekela 13:10:27 02/12/07 (9)

Re: Good point. Next question: - Ted Smith 17:10:43 02/12/07 (8)

To be sure, there are many other causes of resolution loss. - Al Sekela 13:49:52 02/14/07 (7)

RFI, vibrations affect ALL, not confined to CD only. - cheap-Jack 08:02:53 02/15/07 (0)

Re: To be sure, there are many other causes of resolution loss. - Ted Smith 15:34:38 02/14/07 (5)

Yes, but only if they are gross effects. - Al Sekela 13:26:52 02/16/07 (4)

Re: Yes, but only if they are gross effects. - Ted Smith 14:59:33 02/16/07 (3)

Your observations are the starting point. - Al Sekela 16:14:02 02/17/07 (2)

Re: Your observations are the starting point. - Ted Smith 16:39:49 02/17/07 (1)

OK, will do. (nt) - Al Sekela 08:56:43 02/19/07 (0)

Re: This Engineering Publication Gets It Right..... - tomservo 05:37:18 02/12/07 (50)

How right? Don't challenge my aural intelligence, pls. - cheap-Jack 08:20:54 02/12/07 (49)

A lot of pro recording people have tested DSD, 192kHz/24 bit and 44.1kHz/16 bit compared to a live mic signal - Ole Lund Christensen 10:16:14 02/14/07 (1)

Reality check - kerr 11:23:16 02/14/07 (0)

Re: How right? Don't challenge my aural intelligence, pls. - b.l.zeebub 05:42:18 02/13/07 (18)

Not quite right. - Ted Smith 12:50:30 02/13/07 (12)

Re: Not quite right. - b.l.zeebub 02:07:27 02/14/07 (11)

it IS a little confusing - tunenut 15:01:06 02/15/07 (1)

Re: Not quite right. - andy19191 03:13:20 02/14/07 (9)

Re: Not quite right. - b.l.zeebub 10:53:10 02/14/07 (8)

Here's a picture - Ted Smith 14:42:32 02/14/07 (0)

Re: Not quite right. - andy19191 11:54:06 02/14/07 (0)

Re: Not quite right. - Ted Smith 11:17:27 02/14/07 (5)

Re: Not quite right. - Werner 04:21:29 02/15/07 (4)

Thanks - Ted Smith 09:13:49 02/15/07 (3)

Re: Thanks - Werner 23:19:14 02/15/07 (2)

Re: Thanks - Ted Smith 00:30:07 02/16/07 (1)

Re: Thanks - graemme 00:46:18 02/21/07 (0)

Re: How right? Don't challenge my aural intelligence, pls. - bwaslo 11:05:15 02/13/07 (0)

You make your point. (long) - cheap-Jack 08:56:49 02/13/07 (3)

The problem is they put "reading" before "listening".. - cheap-Jack 11:45:58 02/13/07 (0)

As I said elsewhere, mere *listening* is not good enough -- there has to be READING, for these visual-oriented types. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:31:17 02/13/07 (1)

Yup. Thats why those clocks have big numbers and bright orange dots (nt) - AJinFLA 18:04:13 02/13/07 (0)

Re: How right? Don't challenge my aural intelligence, pls. - Presto 16:41:07 02/12/07 (0)

Pay no attention to the naysayers Cheddar-Jack - AJinFLA 16:10:37 02/12/07 (4)

Another Perpetual Pontification Paragraph from Pompus POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 05:39:50 02/15/07 (1)

Well, at least it was more than one word that triggered this rant - AJinFLA 09:42:32 02/15/07 (0)

Better talk your "real facts" to your pets at home. - cheap-Jack 09:02:20 02/13/07 (1)

No need for pets with this much entertainment at my fingertips - AJinFLA 17:51:14 02/13/07 (0)

Re: How right? Don't challenge my aural intelligence, pls. - andy19191 09:33:29 02/12/07 (21)

I also "know" your comment is not "sensible" enough. - cheap-Jack 10:51:36 02/12/07 (9)

Re: I also "know" your comment is not "sensible" enough. - andy19191 12:27:11 02/12/07 (2)

Why don't ask me what labels are these discs intead of speculating? (nt) - cheap-Jack 12:39:18 02/12/07 (1)

Re: Why don't ask me what labels are these discs intead of speculating? (nt) - andy19191 13:17:45 02/12/07 (0)

Re: The provenance of the discs is not necessarily the same. - theaudiohobby 11:33:03 02/12/07 (5)

Have you tried the way I've done before you comment? - cheap-Jack 12:01:59 02/12/07 (4)

Re: When is an apple not an apple? - theaudiohobby 13:49:55 02/12/07 (3)

Nada, my goal is to enjoy better music, regardless of technology. - cheap-Jack 09:12:32 02/13/07 (2)

Re: Nada, my goal is to enjoy better music, regardless of technology. - theaudiohobby 09:19:46 02/13/07 (1)

Why not show us yr useFUL ideas in audio technology? (nt) - cheap-Jack 11:03:45 02/13/07 (0)

...or his Redbook player has something wrong with it. (nt) - Al Sekela 09:45:42 02/12/07 (10)

Re: ...or his Redbook player has something wrong with it. (nt) - andy19191 10:40:35 02/12/07 (9)

Talk sense please. - cheap-Jack 11:05:18 02/12/07 (8)

Re: Talk sense please. - bwaslo 11:37:42 02/12/07 (7)

So what? - cheap-Jack 12:37:11 02/12/07 (6)

Re: So what? - bwaslo 11:10:15 02/13/07 (5)

Why not leave it to the experts? - cheap-Jack 12:16:06 02/13/07 (4)

Re: Why not leave it to the experts? - bwaslo 19:38:35 02/13/07 (3)

Have you burnt out any disks to compare? (nt) - cheap-Jack 07:26:59 02/14/07 (2)

Re: Have you burnt out any disks to compare? (nt) - bwaslo 10:27:36 02/14/07 (1)

Re: Have you burnt out any disks to compare? (nt) - kerr 11:27:03 02/14/07 (0)

Follow Ups

A lot of pro recording people have tested DSD, 192kHz/24 bit and 44.1kHz/16 bit compared to a live mic signal - Ole Lund Christensen 10:16:14 02/14/07 (1)

Reality check - kerr 11:23:16 02/14/07 (0)