In Reply to: "Who's right, ahhh, the engineers of course. *They know it all.*" posted by clarkjohnsen on February 8, 2007 at 14:28:34:
We talked about this subject last week on our blog... with a slightly different take (and FYI, flames > dev/null. Sorry.):
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Who is right? It is easier to point out who is wrong. - justacoder 18:34:42 02/08/07 (16)
- I do not understand you - jensw 20:06:03 02/09/07 (0)
- "PhD’s, Physicists, and other people who should know better..." Hey waitaminnit pal. - clarkjohnsen 11:35:59 02/09/07 (5)
- I presume you're joking... It is so sad that they teach people numbers and equations in schools, but not how to think... - justacoder 19:28:13 02/09/07 (4)
- Sour grapes. (nt) - Jim Austin 16:22:46 02/10/07 (0)
- WATCH OUT! Jim Austin, PhD, may try to take you down in Stereophile. - clarkjohnsen 10:10:41 02/10/07 (1)
- Yip yip! (nt) - Jim Austin 16:23:22 02/10/07 (0)
- Re: I presume you're joking... It is so sad that they teach people numbers and equations in schools, but not how to thin - john curl 19:57:24 02/09/07 (0)
- So if we dismiss witchcraft out of hand - Tom Brennan 18:44:50 02/08/07 (5)
- Closed minded is a pejorative. Perhaps expedient is more like it. And not scientific in any case. - justacoder 11:18:10 02/09/07 (4)
- Curious - kerr 17:15:01 02/09/07 (3)
- In '82 or so I got the TI 99/4A PC and that was it... - justacoder 18:51:03 02/09/07 (2)
- Have you ever experienced moments when time seems to stop? Or anyway... - clarkjohnsen 10:17:07 02/10/07 (0)
- The only thing I'm positive about Chi is... - kerr 07:24:17 02/10/07 (0)
- The 4 steps you linked to are great but doing the first 2 only do not cut it. - fortysomething 19:47:05 02/08/07 (2)
- ..so true, so true.. - ontrack2@gmail.com 21:30:08 02/08/07 (1)
- Luckily they let physists in to interpret the results of their particle accerator tests... and not just lay people :-) - justacoder 11:25:38 02/09/07 (0)