In Reply to: "Who's right, ahhh, the engineers of course. *They know it all.*" posted by clarkjohnsen on February 8, 2007 at 14:28:34:
1 Measurable and audible
2 Measurable and not audible
3 Not measurable at the current time but is audible
4 Not measurable at the current time but is also not audibleYou seem to stumble on the "not audible" possibilities (2 and 4 above) ... but you muddy the issue by claiming there's no way to test for audibility except to trust whatever an audiophile says. That moves you beyond subjective ... into gullible
And you further muddy the issue by launching broad character attacks against anyone who disagrees with you.
.
.
.
.
Richard BassNut Greene
Subjective Audiophile 2007
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- They know some things can be measured but are not audible while others can't be measured and are also not audible - Richard BassNut Greene 09:18:10 02/09/07 (0)