In Reply to: Would you be so kind as to clarify something for me? posted by bjh on February 1, 2007 at 08:21:02:
BJH,You asked: Is the "Resonator room treatment" a reference to the Acoustic System resonator product? Yes, I do believe that the "Resonator room treatment" is indeed a reference to the Acoustic System resonator product. That's why I brought it up, just in case anyone near this area would like too see and hear for themselves, these devices in action. But I haven't verified this with Chris as of yet.
But no, the "good number of us" in the following quote does not include me personally. It wasn't meant to read that way. The quote... "The Resonators are quite small (wife friendly) and a good number of us (members of SCAS) were positively impressed with what we heard at Mike's." ...was taken from the email I said I received. I don't belong to the Space Coast Audio Society (SCAS) I belong to Central Florida Audio Sociey (CFAS). Sorry for any confusion.
Thetubeguy1954
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- No Problem - thetubeguy1954 08:58:27 02/01/07 (26)
- Thanks, - bjh 09:47:25 02/01/07 (25)
- Re: Thanks, - thetubeguy1954 13:04:49 02/01/07 (24)
- Your point taken. - cheap-Jack 08:04:58 02/02/07 (0)
- Very well, only allow me to point out - bjh 14:40:05 02/01/07 (22)
- Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 12:17:48 02/02/07 (20)
- Re: Perhaps You're Right - AJinFLA 18:21:47 02/05/07 (8)
- Re: Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 06:16:24 02/06/07 (4)
- It is not me you must convince, it is you. - AJinFLA 16:45:55 02/06/07 (1)
- Another Moronic Reply From That Bird-Brain POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 11:09:05 02/08/07 (0)
- Re: Perhaps You're Right - theaudiohobby 08:05:32 02/06/07 (1)
- Re: Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 10:36:43 02/06/07 (0)
- Re: Perhaps You're Right - andy19191 05:07:00 02/06/07 (2)
- Do you consider yourself to be an "objective audiophile" or a "non-audiophile"? - AJinFLA 16:54:06 02/06/07 (1)
- Re: Do you consider yourself to be an "objective audiophile" or a "non-audiophile"? - andy19191 01:32:12 02/07/07 (0)
- You're rare but not alone - kerr 13:35:21 02/03/07 (10)
- Re: You're alone but not rare - AJinFLA 18:31:56 02/05/07 (1)
- Wow! You made sense! - kerr 07:34:42 02/06/07 (0)
- You guys will do just about anything to avoid actually proving you can detect what you say you can. - Pat D 18:01:02 02/05/07 (7)
- I've already proven it! - kerr 07:29:03 02/06/07 (6)
- Hardly. The burden of proof is on those who make the claim. We point out they haven't met it. (nt) - Pat D 07:53:24 02/06/07 (5)
- No One Is Under ANY Burden To Provide Proof To Others! - thetubeguy1954 06:25:47 02/07/07 (3)
- You don't understand burden of proof. - Pat D 12:02:04 02/08/07 (1)
- Pat D YOU Don't Understand That No One Is Under Any Burden To Provide You With Proof. - thetubeguy1954 11:53:50 02/09/07 (0)
- Exactly - kerr 07:51:05 02/07/07 (0)
- But we HAVE met the burden of proof. The only disagreement is to whom we carry that burden (nt) - kerr 08:32:05 02/06/07 (0)
- Umm... - kerr 11:49:09 02/02/07 (0)