In Reply to: Proof that Hawksford was wrong?? Hmm. posted by John Escallier on March 13, 2003 at 06:50:16:
"In attempting to discuss these possibilities in a professional and courteous manner with Hawksford (John Curl was copied on that correspondence, please do not question me on how courteous and professional I really was, as that would force me to provide a copy of that correspondance without Hawksford's permission); after the second e-mail, where I detailed specifically the test setup errors I met with and corrected, and how they are exactly the same errors he may have encountered: He stopped all correspondance...Complete, total, utter radio silence.."John;
I would never question how courteous you treat people as I have never seen you be anything but courteous to people on here, even those who may attack you. Many people, myself included could learn from your example.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Proof that Hawksford was wrong?? Hmm. - Nightfly! 07:22:13 03/13/03 (3)
- Well...I gotta update you... - John Escallier 07:27:56 03/13/03 (2)
- Re: Well...I gotta update you... - Nightfly! 08:55:53 03/13/03 (1)
- Re: Well...I gotta update you... - John Escallier 18:04:49 03/15/03 (0)