Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

Re: They were SBTs, Tom!

Pat, You are 100% correct about the tests being SBT's. I'm so used to talking about DBT's with you I let that mistake slip by.

Concerning what you consider to be an obvious tease, I would say that in light of the many posts that we've had in the past and the times you've refered to my intelligence in a less than postive manner, the obvious conclusion would be to believe you weren't teasing, but once again belittling me, no?

But as you state differently and as I've never caught you in an outright lie I'll believe it was meant in jest. Still jesting, sarcasm and the like are best left between those who consider themselves friends and don't have to wonder what the other meant by such comments. Don't you agree?

Although I have no ill-will towards you, I doubt we'd call ourselves friends either. In light of our past posts which are usually anything but friendly in nature, I'm sure how you can see that I wouldn't consider your comment to be "friendly" in nature.

Finally although you state, "The level matching was only done to within .25 dB. I would rather see it within .1 dB." It was good enough for a B.S.E.E. working towards a Master of Science In Electrical & Computer Engineering and 3 professors of Electrical and Computer Engineering I'd say they know a tad more than you or I do.

Like Soundmind above if it doen't agree with your established beliefs it's either a crackpot theory or not good enough. Open your mind Pat, you may be wrong. I've opened my mind and I'm now reading a lot more (some way too technical for me) in an effort to understand, how something can measure bad and sound great. I'm willing to learn, after all I know I may be wrong, are you?

Thetubeguy1954


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Schiit Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.