In Reply to: Good points posted by jbmcb on April 27, 2005 at 22:45:12:
There is much in your post to comment on that will have to wait until tomorrow. I discussed some of the protocol history in my post to Steve directly above this posting. It is probably not relevant to your points, but provides some of my thoughts on the general nature of the protocol methodology that I feel most comfortable with. I did agree to the system "blind" that Kramer insisted upon. My last suggestion on eliminating my observers and thereby eliminating the need for the "blind" were largely ignored until Kramer again twisted the intent of my suggestion in the posting that caused me to put the Challenge on hold until October 1. This posting by Kramer contains two bald faced lies and I simply wasn't going to tolerate that type of behavior any longer.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Good points - Wellfed 23:17:36 04/27/05 (4)
- Sorry - jbmcb 07:26:43 04/28/05 (3)
- The other "guy"... - Wellfed 09:00:40 04/28/05 (2)
- Does she claim... - jbmcb 09:08:46 04/28/05 (1)
- She's never seen a GSIC in person... - Wellfed 09:31:22 04/28/05 (0)