Thank you, John...
Yes, I certainly agree..given the geometry, he was, as are you, correct..it took rethinking the geometry to both change the impedance, and still be compatible.
Impossible is such an interesting word...many people who say so are run over by the people who do it..
And, um....I did say he was correct, in another forum, I believe.....I neglected his error of "negative dielectric required", it really was less than one required, but both are impossible..(hee hee)
JC: ""Too bad that WBT beat you to it, but at least we can try their version, if we wish."" As for it's being worth the patent...I don't know. I'm not sure how many people would actually scramble to pay that kind of money for those connectors...seems to me most of the people in the world either use different standard connectors, or just buy some dollar a pair rca cables, and don't notice a diff in pic quality..doesn't mean there is no diff, just that most don't care, they have other priorities.. So, I don't know how big the market actually is.. Cheers, John
Yah, I would have liked the feather in my cap...however, I did post it in a public forum so I had intended it for public domain..the fact that WBT beat me to it just means they own it...
