In Reply to: Re: not good for the US posted by Roscoe East on December 19, 2006 at 12:52:22:
Just to clarify, what I meant by "at the expense of other Americans" was the fact that those folks who had been employed in all sorts of manufacturing-related jobs are out of a job.But I do see a bit of a puzzle in my argument: Why then is the unemployment rate at only 4.7% if all those jobs are going to China?
I don't have an answer to that.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: not good for the US - Inmate51 06:12:04 12/20/06 (7)
- Re: not good for the US - Bill Fitzmaurice 06:46:56 12/20/06 (0)
- Re: not good for the US - STUART` 06:39:55 12/20/06 (5)
- Re: not good for the US - Inmate51 18:09:36 12/20/06 (4)
- Re: not good for the US - STUART 06:52:09 12/21/06 (0)
- Re: not good for the US - Bill Fitzmaurice 19:12:23 12/20/06 (2)
- Re: not good for the US - Inmate51 07:16:48 12/21/06 (1)
- Re: not good for the US - Bill Fitzmaurice 09:25:50 12/21/06 (0)