In the current issue of enjoythemusic.com an article about polarity dating to 1989 is republished. I think you will all get something out of it.More About Absolute Polarity
Article By Dan Shanefield
From BAS Volume 17 Number 3, November 1989Below see my response.
Where to begin?
Scientists in every field often have contrary opinions, yet Dan Shanifield offers only one source, JAES! A shill perhaps?
I offer a more even-handed view. John Roberts in his 1983 article Exposing Audio Mythology says "Just because the effect of Absolute Polarity is not particularly audible today, doesn't mean that it won't be in ten to twenty years, as speakers and other equipment improve."
Results are all I care about, and I can tell you for a fact that polarity is not just audible, is it critical to hearing the recording properly, which leads to a greater ability to suspend dibelief.
Apparently, there are ways to employ a polarity circuit that validates my experience, and some that would not.
The reason why many people fail to hear polarity is the preponderance of phase incoherent loudspeakers, or what Dr Richard Greiner has called the crossover catastrophe.
FYI: Going back some 15 years, I have easily heard the effects of polarity on Accoustat 2+2s and custom made 4+4s. Genesis Vs, Reference 3A De Capos (one resistor between tweeter and woofer!), Nearfied Acoustics Pipedreams (point source, almost zero distortion), and on my current speakers- Magenpan 3.5Rs; of these all are phase coherent designs. I replaced the OEM passive XOs with a Behringer CX2310 active XO.
Not only does the Behringer (and I would venture any decent active XO)allow the speakers to breathe, it features independent polarity of the L and R inputs, AND individual polarity control for bass, and hi-frequencies, and don't forget the subwoofer, it has polarity control of it, too!
Point 1/3 in Dan Ss article "Not strongly audible to most people". And what planet did he pull that scientific data from- Uranus?
Hmmph! Clearly polarity is important to the Pro industry. Although, like the author, most of them can't hear it, and as a result polarity on recordings is all over the place, especially multimiked recordings, and recordings made from different studios, and times IE "Best of" compilations.
Just because polarity is not strongly audible to Dan S, the editor, or to "most people", doesn't mean it is not a critical component to hearing music in the proper polarity. I can readily hear it on TV broadcasts
I have had many audiophiles hear my systems over the years. They came in polarity virgins, however, it didn't take long to train their ears to appreciate the benefits of polarity, especially when the entire recording polarity is either 0 or 180.
Edits: 12/18/08
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - More about Absolute Polarity - HiOnFi 15:25:38 12/16/08 (35)
- about Absolute Polarity - unclestu52 11:12:41 12/19/08 (0)
- RE: More about Absolute Polarity - smcdonie@uwsp.edu 07:38:03 12/18/08 (0)
- RE: More about Absolute Polarity - b.l.zeebub 06:24:37 12/18/08 (5)
- RE: More about Absolute Polarity - smcdonie@uwsp.edu 07:42:37 12/18/08 (4)
- "The terminals are simply labled red on positive and blk on negative." Quite right. - PolesApart 09:30:18 12/18/08 (1)
- RE: "The terminals are simply labled red on positive and blk on negative." Quite right. - b.l.zeebub 10:09:54 12/18/08 (0)
- RE: More about Absolute Polarity - b.l.zeebub 08:53:19 12/18/08 (1)
- Interesting - unclestu52 10:59:08 12/18/08 (0)
- RE: More about Absolute Polarity - Dawnrazor 21:47:28 12/16/08 (7)
- RE: More about Absolute Polarity - harecording 04:10:51 12/17/08 (6)
- a fun game to play and a cheap tweak - Tony Lauck 11:59:32 12/21/08 (0)
- RE: More about Absolute Polarity - Dawnrazor 08:48:21 12/21/08 (4)
- RE: More about Absolute Polarity - harecording 11:28:15 12/21/08 (3)
- True for a pure sine wave, - unclestu52 13:22:42 12/21/08 (2)
- RE: True for a pure sine wave, - harecording 13:57:48 12/21/08 (1)
- I know what a sine wave is... - unclestu52 18:37:34 12/21/08 (0)
- RE: More about Absolute Polarity - harecording 19:48:50 12/16/08 (18)
- about Absolute Polarity - unclestu52 22:59:10 12/17/08 (6)
- RE: about Absolute Polarity - b.l.zeebub 03:52:08 12/18/08 (5)
- All crossovers - unclestu52 10:33:24 12/18/08 (4)
- RE: All crossovers - b.l.zeebub 09:09:00 12/19/08 (3)
- RE: All crossovers - unclestu52 11:00:01 12/19/08 (2)
- RE: All crossovers - b.l.zeebub 17:40:48 12/19/08 (1)
- RE: All crossovers - rbakedq 06:45:30 01/02/09 (0)
- "All you high end buffoons" -- Well how about you pro audio buffoons? - PolesApart 11:59:40 12/17/08 (10)
- RE: "All you high end buffoons" -- Well how about you pro audio buffoons? - harecording 17:31:38 12/17/08 (0)
- RE: "All you high end buffoons" -- Well how about you pro audio buffoons? - harecording 16:10:47 12/17/08 (8)
- "I would never put a battery on a speaker. That's stupid." (Ahem!) - PolesApart 09:35:21 12/18/08 (2)
- RE: "I would never put a battery on a speaker. That's stupid." (Ahem!) - Frost 10:44:09 01/08/09 (0)
- RE: "I would never put a battery on a speaker. That's stupid." (Ahem!) - harecording 17:32:32 12/18/08 (0)
- RE: "All you high end buffoons" -- Well how about you pro audio buffoons? - smcdonie@uwsp.edu 07:54:57 12/18/08 (2)
- RE: "All you high end buffoons" -- Well how about you pro audio buffoons? - fff 19:21:03 03/01/09 (0)
- RE: "All you high end buffoons" -- Well how about you pro audio buffoons? - harecording 17:33:42 12/18/08 (0)
- dumb - Coner 18:02:57 12/17/08 (1)
- RE: dumb - harecording 02:47:53 12/18/08 (0)