In Reply to: PA backwash posted by susiejennings@earthlink.net on September 12, 2008 at 22:00:36:
I guarantee its the beta 87
I did a large outside show and I had more feedback issues with those
things then you can believe and it was low end feedback
I swapped out all of the 87's on a break with Audix Om3's and wala
the low end feedback issues were solved instantly by dumping those
mics
I am not impressed with that mic and they are way overpriced
I highly doubt the problem is cabinet resonance
Im well aware of feedback suppressor issues
I just figured anyone who calls it back was has no clue and a feedback
destroyer would be an easy fix for him
Try a different mic instead of the 87
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: PA backwash - smcdonie@uwsp.edu 13:30:37 09/26/08 (10)
- RE: PA backwash - harecording 11:04:04 09/27/08 (9)
- RE: PA backwash - smcdonie@uwsp.edu 09:01:47 09/30/08 (8)
- RE: PA backwash - harecording 17:31:10 09/30/08 (7)
- RE: PA backwash - smcdonie@uwsp.edu 10:09:34 10/01/08 (6)
- RE: PA backwash - harecording 10:15:17 10/01/08 (5)
- RE: PA backwash - smcdonie@uwsp.edu 10:28:46 10/01/08 (2)
- RE: PA backwash - harecording 11:23:59 10/01/08 (1)
- RE: PA backwash - smcdonie@uwsp.edu 12:52:27 10/01/08 (0)
- RE: PA backwash - smcdonie@uwsp.edu 10:22:46 10/01/08 (0)
- RE: PA backwash - smcdonie@uwsp.edu 10:20:58 10/01/08 (0)