In Reply to: A brief look into USB 2.0 cable specs and implementation posted by kurt s on October 3, 2011 at 01:16:27:
Nice post Kurt.
I would like to comment that RS-232 is (sadly) anything but an "industrial grade" interface. It is a low speed, unisolated, unbalanced interface designed for local interface to modems. That's it. Everything else it was used for was a bastardization and frought with problems.
But it was the ONLY thing resembling a "desktop" network that had any support for many years and having worked with it for quite a few of them I can attest that it's a HW and SW PITA. The USB scheme is different in many respects but the main thing it has going is that it was actually created to be a desktop network.
Now I'm retired so am just a "user" and I'm delighted with how well the scheme has been working the last decade, what a huge improvement for both the users and manufacturers. Our tech-support folks used to spend about 2/3 of their time trying to resolve customer's 232 related problems...
Rick
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: A brief look into USB 2.0 cable specs and implementation - rick_m 05:48:07 10/03/11 (3)
- RE: A brief look into USB 2.0 cable specs and implementation - kurt s 07:30:03 10/03/11 (2)
- RE: A brief look into USB 2.0 cable specs and implementation - Old Listener 09:55:43 10/03/11 (1)
- RE: A brief look into USB 2.0 cable specs and implementation - kurt s 17:50:25 10/03/11 (0)