In Reply to: RE: Baloney posted by Tony Lauck on January 6, 2011 at 21:06:39:
Howdy
Read what I wrote: you didn't address any of my points.
Metastability isn't a red hearing. I didn't say that it's a problem now, I was trying to imply that jitter is like metastability in that both used to be scoffed at and as time goes on they both got taken more seriously.
I also said nothing about my designs or my design skills. Nor was I referring to my own designs. I was speaking from a fundamental knowledge of engineering. (As to my design choices you obviously haven't been paying attention and are making many unfounded assumptions.)
Tho many of your posts are helpful to at least some of the readers here, some of you other posts confuse the issues because you talk out of hat instead of speaking from knowledge or at least first verifying your assumptions. Wisdom is knowing the difference between what you do know and what you don't know.
-Ted
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Baloney - Ted Smith 11:26:16 01/09/11 (11)
- RE: Baloney - Tony Lauck 11:38:49 01/09/11 (10)
- Thanks for the good wishes. - Ted Smith 12:46:12 01/09/11 (9)
- RE: Thanks for the good wishes. - Tony Lauck 09:04:46 01/12/11 (3)
- RE: Thanks for the good wishes. - Ted Smith 22:56:26 01/15/11 (2)
- RE: Thanks for the good wishes. - Tony Lauck 07:12:26 01/16/11 (1)
- RE: Thanks for the good wishes. - Ted Smith 14:06:21 01/16/11 (0)
- Nice post... - rick_m 14:47:49 01/09/11 (4)
- Thanks - Ted Smith 16:06:33 01/09/11 (3)
- RE: Thanks - rick_m 17:36:11 01/09/11 (2)
- RE: Thanks - Ted Smith 19:41:51 01/09/11 (1)
- RE: Thanks - rick_m 09:42:09 01/10/11 (0)