In Reply to: Izotope posted by audioengr on December 21, 2009 at 10:02:09:
> Have you tried comparing a file upsampled with
> Izotope/Wave Editor? . . . A steal at $79 IMO
No, actually I haven't.
I decided to spring the $850 for Saracon partly on the
basis of the graphs at
http://src.infinitewave.ca/
(slow rolloff, you know. ;-> )
and partly because if I'm going to invest so much time
in offline upsampling (I've already invested a considerable
amount of time just on the same couple-dozen albums, but
at some point I want to declare the experimental phase over
and get on with building a substantial library of converted
CDs without worrying about which tool and/or procedure
might be better) I wanted the peace of mind that I expected
to have by going with Saracon.
Also, of course, if you don't already have a Mac,
Wave Editor is going to be more than $79. ;->
However, I do have a Hackintosh of sorts: a hacked
OS-X Leopard running (not terribly quickly) in a VMWare
virtual machine. Maybe, just for giggles, I'll spring
for Wave Editor and install it there (I'll have to use
MacDrive to exchange the audio files between the virtual
Mac and the PC).
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Izotope - Jim F. 10:56:30 12/21/09 (7)
- RE: Izotope - jtwrace 11:55:11 12/21/09 (6)
- Does Izotope have a batch processing feature? - Brucemck2 07:17:53 12/23/09 (5)
- RE: Does Izotope have a batch processing feature? - cfmsp 12:20:49 12/23/09 (0)
- RE: Does Izotope have a batch processing feature? - Jim F. 11:08:10 12/23/09 (1)
- RE: Does Izotope have a batch processing feature? - Jim F. 15:57:39 12/23/09 (0)
- RE: Does Izotope have a batch processing feature? - audioengr 10:06:37 12/23/09 (0)
- RE: Does Izotope have a batch processing feature? - Jim F. 09:33:03 12/23/09 (0)