In Reply to: RE: Here's a serious answer to your question posted by Squonk on August 17, 2009 at 15:17:02:
The Microsoft HDCD decoder, as well as the reverse-engineered one, only implement 2/3 aspects of HDCD, namely
1. proprietary dithering and noise shaping (this doesn't require decoding, so even non-HDCD players benefit from this)
2. peak expansion (this is the *only* thing that the Microsoft HDCD decoding does, by the way, that's why it's so easy to reverse-engineer)
So far, no software HDCD decoder implement dynamic filter switching. The author of the reverse engineered HDCD decoder wisely left the HDCD frames intact so that some future enterprising soul can decode them, but unfortunately the filter parameters are not published and not easy to reverse-engineer.
Arguably, of course, dynamically switching playback filters isn't a very good idea and of questionable benefit. Also, I doubt any recent HDCDs were recorded using the proprietary HDCD ADC which uses dynamic filters.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Here's something that not many people know ... - Christine Tham 15:42:06 08/17/09 (33)
- Is HDCD dynamic filtering possibe at sw level? - The Sound Guy 07:52:11 08/18/09 (13)
- Yes, that's the way it is implemented in most AV receivers - Christine Tham 14:27:07 08/18/09 (7)
- Geez, Christine, what does it take? - Charles Hansen 22:07:06 08/18/09 (6)
- RE: Geez, Christine, what does it take? - Tony Lauck 06:07:29 08/19/09 (5)
- RE: Geez, Christine, what does it take? - fmak 23:11:54 08/19/09 (0)
- subtractive dither - The Sound Guy 08:17:42 08/19/09 (3)
- RE: subtractive dither - Tony Lauck 09:20:57 08/19/09 (2)
- RE: subtractive dither - The Sound Guy 12:31:21 08/19/09 (1)
- RE: subtractive dither - Tony Lauck 13:55:45 08/19/09 (0)
- Read my lips. - Charles Hansen 11:29:42 08/18/09 (4)
- RE: Read my lips. - The Sound Guy 07:14:31 08/19/09 (3)
- More Pacific Microsonics marketing bull - Charles Hansen 19:50:32 08/19/09 (2)
- RE: More Pacific Microsonics marketing bull - The Sound Guy 11:38:58 08/21/09 (1)
- Your linked post is excellent - Charles Hansen 21:53:26 08/21/09 (0)
- Also wrong! - Charles Hansen 23:50:31 08/17/09 (0)
- Wrong! - Charles Hansen 23:44:51 08/17/09 (15)
- Suggestion for change to your subject field writing style - tcell 12:58:48 08/18/09 (14)
- The reason for my tone in this particular instance... - Charles Hansen 22:03:50 08/18/09 (6)
- RE: The reason for my tone in this particular instance... - fmak 00:14:53 08/19/09 (5)
- That is why Pacific Microsonics went out of business - Charles Hansen 19:54:47 08/19/09 (4)
- RE: That is why Pacific Microsonics went out of business - GCrouser@hvc.rr.com 05:19:04 08/20/09 (3)
- No, most people just buy on the basis of price - Charles Hansen 12:59:44 08/20/09 (2)
- Re: Small companies and music prices. - rick_m 14:57:53 08/20/09 (1)
- RE: Re: Small companies and music prices. - Tony Lauck 10:41:47 08/21/09 (0)
- Strictly matter of taste. - carcass93 19:25:55 08/18/09 (0)
- Thanks - Christine Tham 14:37:51 08/18/09 (5)
- By the way, more typical veiled insults from you - Charles Hansen 22:23:53 08/18/09 (2)
- Illuminating read... And it's certainly funny that one party has a nerve to complain about "treatment". - carcass93 10:03:44 08/19/09 (1)
- Unfortunately not that illuminating about things that matter - Charles Hansen 19:58:29 08/19/09 (0)
- Whoa, I think there's a name for that complex.... - Charles Hansen 22:12:13 08/18/09 (0)
- Thank YOU for all of your contibutions to this forum (nt) - tcell 17:09:13 08/18/09 (0)
- RE: Here's something that not many people know ... - Tony Lauck 19:16:43 08/17/09 (1)
- RE: Here's something that not many people know ... - Christine Tham 20:31:25 08/17/09 (0)