![]() |
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports posted by artcheng@netvigator.com on September 16, 2007 at 07:53:13:
In section 4.16, affinities, process priorities and suspensions are done for running foobar optimally. This uses above process utility.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - cics 15:07:18 09/14/07 (81)
- External 24 BIT/192KHz DAC - sozeh 09:03:01 03/25/09 (0)
- It's best to post on cMP thread - cics 09:49:00 03/25/09 (0)
- Bit Perfect Measurement & Analysis - cics 04:06:06 12/20/07 (0)
- Toslink vs Coax - cics 09:31:25 10/16/07 (1)
- RE: Toslink vs Coax - BFitz 14:14:01 10/16/07 (0)
- Changes to Version 0.3 - cics 21:05:55 10/10/07 (30)
- 7. [Change] Upgrade to Foobar2000 0.9.5 (ignore 0.9.4.5) - cics 12:28:40 11/17/07 (2)
- RE: 7. [Change] Upgrade to Foobar2000 0.9.5 (ignore 0.9.4.5) - db 13:37:34 11/17/07 (1)
- RE: 7. [Change] Upgrade to Foobar2000 0.9.5 (ignore 0.9.4.5) - cics 08:26:17 11/18/07 (0)
- 6. [Change] Use P4M900 based motherboard - cics 22:38:23 10/20/07 (6)
- Disable 'High Precision Event Timer (HPET)' under System Devices - cics 22:22:03 11/24/07 (2)
- What about WDRT? - edward 14:41:26 11/26/07 (1)
- RE: What about WDRT? - cics 00:40:15 11/29/07 (0)
- DDR2 400? - edward 10:53:59 11/06/07 (2)
- They're referring to maximum speed supported. 200MHz works fine... - cics 11:57:04 11/06/07 (1)
- RE: They're referring to maximum speed supported. 200MHz works fine... - edward 13:44:35 11/06/07 (0)
- RE: Changes to Version 0.3 - Audio Bling 10:23:06 10/12/07 (10)
- Mobos based on VIA chipsets - cics 21:20:07 10/12/07 (9)
- RE: Mobos based on VIA chipsets - seger 13:53:25 10/30/07 (8)
- It's worth trying out - cics 06:07:41 11/01/07 (7)
- RE: It's worth trying out - seger 14:26:15 11/01/07 (6)
- RE: It's worth trying out - cics 11:57:28 11/05/07 (5)
- RE: It's worth trying out - seger 03:45:18 11/07/07 (4)
- RE: It's worth trying out - cics 06:47:46 11/07/07 (3)
- RE: It's worth trying out - texastea006@yahoo.com 07:10:33 11/13/07 (2)
- RE: It's worth trying out - cics 10:01:28 11/16/07 (1)
- RE: It's worth trying out - texastea006@yahoo.com 09:22:01 11/20/07 (0)
- 5. [New] Powering HDDs externally removes significant internal electrical interference - cics 22:05:31 10/10/07 (4)
- RE: 5. [New] Powering HDDs externally removes significant internal electrical interference - kana813 09:54:07 10/11/07 (3)
- RE: 5. [New] Powering HDDs externally removes significant internal electrical interference - cics 20:57:22 10/12/07 (2)
- RE: 5. [New] Powering HDDs externally removes significant internal electrical interference - kana813 09:50:36 10/16/07 (0)
- RE: 5. [New] Powering HDDs externally removes significant internal electrical interference - kana813 23:21:57 10/12/07 (0)
- 4. [Info] Schematics of normal PC vs Computer Transport - cics 21:36:57 10/10/07 (0)
- 3. [Change] Reduce interference of Soundcard's Mixer process - cics 21:24:01 10/10/07 (0)
- 2. [Info] How 2 connect computer PSU to components - cics 21:11:33 10/10/07 (0)
- 1. [Info] Use of powered subs in Home Theatre systems - cics 21:08:07 10/10/07 (0)
- HDDs with NO power consumption! - cics 02:44:13 10/06/07 (9)
- RE: HDDs with NO power consumption! - edward 13:41:19 11/06/07 (2)
- RE: HDDs with NO power consumption! - theob 09:52:31 04/10/08 (0)
- RE: HDDs with NO power consumption! - n_vincent 16:36:43 11/27/07 (0)
- RE: HDDs with NO power consumption! - cics 19:48:46 11/06/07 (0)
- Also use less aggressive RAM latencies of 3-3-3-? @ 200MHz - cics 15:43:07 10/07/07 (0)
- RE: HDDs with NO power consumption! - kana813 13:49:08 10/06/07 (4)
- This is the same post on Audiogon. - cics 15:46:21 10/07/07 (3)
- RE: This is the same post on Audiogon. - kana813 18:06:57 10/07/07 (2)
- A look into HDD noise pollution - cics 13:09:35 10/08/07 (1)
- RE: A look into HDD noise pollution - kana4813 23:09:19 10/08/07 (0)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - BFitz 06:47:37 10/04/07 (1)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - cics 14:24:52 10/04/07 (0)
- Connecting PSU to components in a better way - cics 03:31:51 10/04/07 (0)
- Note for Home Theatre setups - cics 05:28:02 09/29/07 (0)
- dCS Scarlatti VS Computer Transport - cics 22:52:10 09/27/07 (0)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - soundchekk 06:47:16 09/26/07 (13)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - cics 12:15:38 09/26/07 (12)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - texastea006@yahoo.com 14:13:11 09/27/07 (5)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - cics 23:04:34 09/27/07 (3)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - texastea006@yahoo.com 08:54:40 09/28/07 (2)
- RME Soundcards - cics 23:25:11 10/01/07 (0)
- Still using Toslink with Audioquests Optilink-5 - cics 10:18:20 09/28/07 (0)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - texastea006@yahoo.com 14:15:00 09/27/07 (0)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - texastea006@yahoo.com 14:12:37 09/27/07 (0)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - texastea006@yahoo.com 14:09:38 09/27/07 (0)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - soundcheckk 08:49:02 09/27/07 (3)
- Going to test Linux, Vista & XP using Solid State Disk - cics 10:33:37 09/28/07 (2)
- RE: Going to test Linux, Vista & XP using Solid State Disk - edward 16:15:30 09/28/07 (1)
- RE: Going to test Linux, Vista & XP using Solid State Disk - cics 05:18:42 09/29/07 (0)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - 64 bit 16:21:16 09/23/07 (3)
- Re: Why E6300 and not lower spec E2160 or E2180? - cics 10:45:37 09/24/07 (2)
- RE: Re: Why E6300 and not lower spec E2160 or E2180? - nc 15:14:08 09/27/07 (1)
- RE: Re: Why E6300 and not lower spec E2160 or E2180? - cics 10:13:43 09/28/07 (0)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - f.step@comcast.net 12:26:11 09/23/07 (1)
- RE: What user interface, placement of PC and Networking. - cics 11:00:53 09/24/07 (0)
- Have you translated this to Vista? - edward 23:41:49 09/18/07 (5)
- RE: Have you translated this to Vista? - cics 00:47:23 09/19/07 (4)
- RE: Have you translated this to Vista? - edward 16:15:57 09/19/07 (3)
- Have you compared optimized Foobar 0.9.4.4 with XXHighEnd? - cics 22:37:52 09/19/07 (2)
- RE: Have you compared optimized Foobar 0.9.4.4 with XXHighEnd? - edward 03:38:30 09/20/07 (1)
- RE: Have you compared optimized Foobar 0.9.4.4 with XXHighEnd? - Telstar 12:59:59 11/20/07 (0)
- Transport or Player? - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 11:53:41 09/18/07 (1)
- RE: Transport or Player? - cics 00:29:17 09/19/07 (0)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - artcheng@netvigator.com 07:53:13 09/16/07 (1)
- How does Setaffinity & Process tamer compare to Beyond Logic's process utility? - cics 23:58:36 09/16/07 (0)
- Thanks (nt) - edward 22:16:49 09/15/07 (0)
- RE: Update v0.3: The Art of building Computer Transports - artcheng@netvigator.com 09:10:05 09/15/07 (0)
Follow Ups
- How does Setaffinity & Process tamer compare to Beyond Logic's process utility? - cics 23:58:36 09/16/07 (0)