In Reply to: RE: What PC audio set up can outperform High end Emmlabs, DCS system? posted by Dawnrazor on August 3, 2007 at 16:42:55:
Dawnrazor
I respond to posts to try to help others. They can reject my take, but it is the Promoters who try to discredit what I post. It so happens that these are those who promote products without technical or measurement justifications. They a LOT of money and I don't have the resources or energy to try such products. I too can make euphonic 16/44.1 by putting a Triode stage or whatever after this; many can. But this does not mean that such a setup is so vastly superior that Inmates should be advised to throw away high end boxes.
PC systems are problematic as you and I have found (so have the Promoters)and nobody quite knows what is going out. The fact that some actually promote 96k from 44.1 as being superior in audio terms just shows the underlying problem of using an src which itself is problematic. http://src.infinitewave.ca/.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: What PC audio set up can outperform High end Emmlabs, DCS system? - fmak 23:13:24 08/03/07 (10)
- Wow, Secret Rabbit Code looks awful in those plots - Slider 10:40:31 08/04/07 (0)
- SRC - audioengr 10:22:50 08/04/07 (5)
- RE: SRC - fmak 14:11:37 08/04/07 (4)
- RE: SRC - audioengr 14:48:07 08/04/07 (3)
- RE: SRC - SashaV 18:46:11 08/04/07 (2)
- Cant be generalized IMO - audioengr 22:10:23 08/04/07 (0)
- I don't think the terms sync and async apply to software - Slider 19:11:59 08/04/07 (0)
- RE: What PC audio set up can outperform High end Emmlabs, DCS system? - Dawnrazor 23:38:21 08/03/07 (2)
- RE: What PC audio set up can outperform High end Emmlabs, DCS system? - fmak 04:15:56 08/04/07 (1)
- RE: What PC audio set up can outperform High end Emmlabs, DCS system? - Dawnrazor 13:05:23 08/04/07 (0)