In Reply to: Argh posted by Scrith on June 3, 2007 at 13:15:29:
*** Oh well, I guess we get to keep living with those who have the seemingly ridiculous notion that FLAC playback sounds different than WAV until I find some other comparison mechanism. :( ***
Here I was thinking it's great that someone has an open mind, but this line now makes me suspect you are only interested in debunking theories you don't believe in. Sigh :-(
Anyway, my thoughts on this are: suppose that FLAC playback sounds different from WAV due to changes in jitter, EMI/RFI, whatever. Note: I am not claiming this is 100% true, but it seems plausible.
Then any attempt to measure this difference using software based ABX switching will affect jitter, EMI/RFI etc. So in other words you are changing what you are trying to measure.
Maybe better to have two identical machines side by side - one playing FLAC, the other playing WAV, and have a friend randomly switch between the two. But then you are likely to encounter differences between the machines, which may be greater than the difference between FLAC and WAV playback.
I don't think you will be able to easily prove or disprove the hypothesis. So relax and enjoy the music.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - Christine Tham 14:33:21 06/03/07 (4)
- RE: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - fmak 22:22:07 06/03/07 (3)
- How it started, thoughts on the test, etc. - Scrith 14:02:39 06/04/07 (2)
- RE: How it started, thoughts on the test, etc.-Problem Is - fmak 02:25:31 06/05/07 (0)
- ABX and ear training - Christine Tham 14:23:24 06/04/07 (0)