Home Computer Audio Asylum

Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies.

Re: I've found it! Something w/ ASIO that sounds better than Foobar2000

85.142.201.243

Yes, sometimes XMPlay+Asio sybjectively sounds better than foobar2000+ASIO (but not on all music material)

I've tested XMPlay+ASIO-32-bit and foobar2000+ASIO-32-bit on M-AUDIO REVO 5.1 on mp3 tracks.

Some live acoustic music tracks (Craig Chaquico, Acoustic Alchemy, Chris Spheeris) espesially guitar strings sounds more raw-nylon-like on XMPlay, more pleasure for some ears.

With modern synthetic, industrial-Metal music - foobar2000 sounds clear-er with more detailed pleasure-sounded synthetic noises, layed in composition by sound engeneers.

The difference is by mp3-decoders (BASS in XMPlay and mpg123 in foobar2000) mpg123 is recommended for LAME, has extremily good (digital) precicion quality and supported by Hydrogen-Audio community.

I don't now anything about objective testing of BASS mp3 decoder.

Difference on lossless formats - is only placebo.



This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Sonic Craft  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • Re: I've found it! Something w/ ASIO that sounds better than Foobar2000 - PaVliQ 12:16:02 05/01/07 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.