|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
|
|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: Well, sort of. posted by j_thunders on April 2, 2007 at 12:46:42:
i can certainly, easily hear the difference between aac and lossless, but i still think 256 aac (w/vbr) is good enough to rip most of my music to. I think it's the best compromise between conserving space and preserving quality. For my "reference" type recordings i use lossless, but the most other stuff 256 sounds great.and i don't think it's that most people can't tell the difference. it's that they never bother to compare it to anything better. Also, if you're system is really crappy, that's a factor too. But if you sat someone down in front of a decent system and compared 128k to 256k to lossless, i think anyone could hear the difference. but if you never heard lossless, how could you know what you're missing?
admin - audioreview.com
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- lossless vs 256 - EL Cheapo 14:52:51 04/02/07 (1)
- I agree anyone can hear a difference between 128kbps and 256.... - j_thunders 15:54:36 04/02/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
