|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
|
|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: RE: RPi5 - the first month posted by E-Stat on December 27, 2023 at 11:43:37:
...the same section of music. The "audio position" of the 44.1K/16 track shows 1 min 24 secs while the second image shows zero. Plus, the time runs of the two tracks are different. Then, the 44.1k/15 track shows 96K/24 on the side.
CD quality has around 96 dB of dynamic range while hirez can go to about 120 dB from a practical standpoint. Contrast that to analog tape or LP formats which typically struggle to get past 70 dB of dynamic range. There is no technical reason that a CD quality can't provide the dynamic range needed for uncompressed music playback.
Now, what the record companies and producers CHOOSE to do with respect to dynamic compression is a whole 'nother issue. If your two images do present a dynamic range difference between the two formats for the same recording, it is because they =wanted= to do that, not because it was due to technical limitations.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Those don't appear to show... - mlsstl 19:41:01 12/27/23 (9)
- RE: Those don't appear to show... - E-Stat 20:35:15 12/27/23 (8)
- RE: Those don't appear to show... - mlsstl 05:12:31 12/28/23 (7)
- Really? - E-Stat 06:15:00 12/28/23 (6)
- Ok... - mlsstl 07:11:11 12/28/23 (5)
- RE: Ok... - E-Stat 07:15:53 12/28/23 (4)
- A follow-up - mlsstl 16:25:24 12/28/23 (3)
- All observed by me in the linked post - E-Stat 16:57:26 12/28/23 (2)
- And now you have a side-by-side example! -nt - mlsstl 18:02:18 12/28/23 (1)
- What I'm thankful for is - E-Stat 06:59:58 12/29/23 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
