I read archimago's measurements about Rasberry Pi 3 today here.
http://archimago.blogspot.ca/2017/01/measurements-raspberry-pi-3-as-usb.html
I'm surprised about his later paragraphs about CRAAP config. He said optimizing OS with CRAAP config like get better sound like this.
Lower clock speed --> less power use --> less CPU noise --> better sound!
Better aligned clock speeds --> less random & periodic jitter --> better sound!
Less power use --> less strain on power supply --> less noise & jitter (cuz it's like that) --> better sound!
He also mentioned about better sound with streaming audio too in this line.
for audio streaming, it's still just as responsive (while sounding better of course!).
I tried to look for measurements between default config and CRAAP config in his website but couldn't find any measurements or scientific explanation to from him. Here's the reasons for his explanation.
And of course it'll sound better due to all the above reasons reducing noise and jitter! (Cuz it's like that...)
Not that I disagree and I know these aren't his comments. But the fact he put it on his website means he agreed to put it on at least. Coming from archimago, I expect showing measurements between using and not using CRAAP configuration like other tests he's been doing so far but I didn't see one this time. What do guys think about CRAAP config for Rasberry Pi 3?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Looking for measurements about audio improvement with Rasberry Pi 3 CRAAP config - Windows X 07:16:57 01/13/17 (29)
- :-) and a note to Abe. - Archimago 14:52:20 01/13/17 (21)
- Your measurements are NOT objective - and you can't be as dense as you pretend to be. - Beef Guinness Cutie Pie 11:50:43 01/17/17 (0)
- RE: :-) and a note to Abe. - E-Stat 06:22:45 01/14/17 (0)
- RE: :-) and a note to Abe. - Mercman 15:56:43 01/13/17 (6)
- RE: :-) and a note to Abe. - Archimago 19:16:21 01/13/17 (5)
- RE: :-) and a note to Abe. - Cut-Throat 05:33:15 01/14/17 (2)
- Silly me - E-Stat 14:14:32 01/14/17 (0)
- RE: :-) and a note to Abe. - Mercman 06:23:04 01/14/17 (0)
- RE: :-) and a note to Abe. - Mercman 02:24:07 01/14/17 (1)
- Relevance - fmak 06:40:26 01/14/17 (0)
- +1 ...... We are in agreement here............nt - Cut-Throat 15:38:03 01/13/17 (0)
- RE: :-) and a note to Abe. - AbeCollins 15:20:21 01/13/17 (7)
- Have you noticed - E-Stat 09:40:41 01/15/17 (5)
- Just to be fair... - mlsstl 14:05:39 01/16/17 (4)
- Sorry, but - E-Stat 14:33:07 01/16/17 (3)
- You missed the point - mlsstl 19:09:52 01/16/17 (1)
- What point? - E-Stat 05:41:55 01/17/17 (0)
- RE: Sorry, but - AbeCollins 16:39:46 01/16/17 (0)
- Examples, Abe. - Archimago 20:45:37 01/13/17 (0)
- RE: :-) and a note to Abe. - Windows X 15:11:00 01/13/17 (2)
- Win X - sure... RE: :-) and a note to Abe. - Archimago 18:31:44 01/13/17 (1)
- RE: Win X - sure... RE: :-) and a note to Abe. - Windows X 23:21:29 01/13/17 (0)
- RE: Looking for measurements about audio improvement with Rasberry Pi 3 CRAAP config - Roseval 14:26:37 01/13/17 (1)
- Yup. - Archimago 14:52:56 01/13/17 (0)
- RE: Looking for measurements about audio improvement with Rasberry Pi 3 CRAAP config - AbeCollins 09:40:10 01/13/17 (0)
- How could anything sound better with a name like "CRAAP"?........nt - Cut-Throat 07:43:10 01/13/17 (3)
- RE: How could anything sound better with a name like "CRAAP"?........nt - fmak 17:22:58 01/13/17 (0)
- Mebbe it sounds like Schiit? [nt] - Beetlemania 08:51:50 01/13/17 (1)
- +1 .............LOL........nt - Cut-Throat 09:29:31 01/13/17 (0)