In Reply to: Too funny, fmak! posted by E-Stat on January 4, 2017 at 06:08:16:
You haven't laid down any basis for your 'optimisation', which has no subjective or objective target except for your say so. From your posting history, I don't believe you.
If you don't want to take part in what I suggested, that's fine and just butt out.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Too deliberatly obtuse - fmak 06:55:10 01/04/17 (11)
- Too clueless - E-Stat 07:19:11 01/04/17 (10)
- I don't - fmak 07:49:53 01/04/17 (9)
- RE: I don't - E-Stat 07:54:55 01/04/17 (8)
- RE: I don't - SBGK 04:28:26 01/05/17 (1)
- Exactly - E-Stat 05:49:57 01/05/17 (0)
- RE: I don't-I did look at your system - fmak 11:50:24 01/04/17 (5)
- I'll ask the question again - E-Stat 16:31:06 01/04/17 (4)
- RE: I'll ask the question again - fmak 21:58:32 01/04/17 (3)
- You can lead a horse to water - E-Stat 05:51:42 01/05/17 (2)
- Blowng your trumpet on - fmak 06:47:39 01/05/17 (1)
- RE: Blowng your trumpet on - AbeCollins 20:41:52 01/09/17 (0)