In Reply to: RE: Now I have comparison 1.5 and 2.6 posted by paco on December 20, 2016 at 13:37:01:
It looks like I'll be committing to A+ and buying a new license unless something else comes along. So next question is whether the sound quality is better in native Audirvana rather than using iTunes for the playlists? I have to say that the A+ front end looks pretty similar to iTunes anyway.The better sound quality I'm getting is with the Audirvana front end. So is there any general consensus that A+ sounds better in native mode?
Edits: 12/20/16
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Wondering whether to ditch iTunes and use the Audirvana front end - andy evans 14:06:09 12/20/16 (12)
- RE: Wondering whether to ditch iTunes and use the Audirvana front end - paco 23:06:25 12/20/16 (8)
- RE: Wondering whether to ditch iTunes and use the Audirvana front end - AbeCollins 08:35:03 12/21/16 (7)
- "iTunes has a much easier library manager" - Chris from Lafayette 14:22:15 12/21/16 (6)
- RE: "iTunes has a much easier library manager" - AbeCollins 15:34:53 12/21/16 (5)
- Macbooks have appalling service in the UK - andy evans 05:41:20 12/23/16 (1)
- I've had outstanding service here at US Apple Stores - AbeCollins 06:38:02 12/23/16 (0)
- I had to upgrade my iMac last week - Chris from Lafayette 17:02:14 12/21/16 (2)
- RE: I had to upgrade my iMac last week - AbeCollins 20:30:38 12/21/16 (0)
- My mid 2011 Macbook Airi is about to go... - Ivan303 18:47:21 12/21/16 (0)
- RE: Wondering whether to ditch iTunes and use the Audirvana front end - shane. 20:51:42 12/20/16 (0)
- One last thing. . . - Chris from Lafayette 15:30:53 12/20/16 (1)
- Good point always, but it's more than sound levels - andy evans 15:45:33 12/20/16 (0)