In Reply to: Redbook Proven to be not transparent posted by Tony Lauck on September 13, 2014 at 10:06:18:
Hi Tony!
Golly! Do I have to read that entire 1,000+ post thread?
"Recently, the ground on which the objectivists stood has been washed down the river to the sea."
I'm not sure I'd be willing to declare that just yet. I've only read a few pages of your link so far. First of all I'd like someone to check the provenance of the "smoking gun" files to make sure there wasn't an issue in preparing them. Secondly, are we testing the transparency of 16bit, 44k files or the audibility of the conversion of files to that format? Finally, if the test is legit and the results correct, then that would be insanely cool! Could these results be expanded to more general musical files than some homemade files of jingling keys?
All the best and looking forward to reading more of that thread!
JE
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Redbook Proven to be not transparent - Jaundiced Ear 14:03:02 09/13/14 (4)
- RE: Redbook Proven to be not transparent - Tony Lauck 14:19:40 09/13/14 (3)
- "You have to read .... 4000+ posts" - or, he could assemble a reasonably resolving system, and listen. - carcass93 08:44:07 09/15/14 (0)
- RE: Redbook Proven to be not transparent - Jaundiced Ear 22:32:03 09/14/14 (1)
- RE: Redbook Proven to be not transparent - Tony Lauck 11:57:33 09/15/14 (0)