In Reply to: RE: might it work on XP X64 also? posted by SBGK on September 6, 2013 at 15:34:02:
Hi SBGK,I was not repaired for this, what a superb sound quality !!
I can't see anything left too wish for on sound quality.
This is it. It was some sort of an 'enlightening' experience.
Without any tuning to the WIN7 OS system at all, it sounds soooo good!
Looking at the number of downloads, I would like too say too other inmates:
Do try !! You don't know what you miss on Sound Quality!BTW, I red the very unpleasant conversation on the computeraudiophile forum between you and the developer of HQplayer. I'm very glad you stayed motivated and continued work on your player. HQplayer doesn't sound bad, but your player sounds much (!!) better than HQplayer. In my view, he is just pissed because your player is free (your free player is a threat for his sales)
I could not find my way around your downloads.
I could not locate version number 2.27, so I downloaded mnqplay.exe 3.10 sse4 intel.
Is this the one?I'm now trying too get this work on Foobar, hoping it will get more user friendly.
I would like to play my favorite classical piece, Akhnaten from Philip Glass, gappless.Thank you for developing such a player!
It shows the way too other developers.Mark
Edits: 09/10/13
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Whow, I wasn't repaired for this. What a SUPERB sound quality !!! - hfavandepas 09:29:09 09/10/13 (31)
- RE: Whow, I wasn't repaired for this. What a SUPERB sound quality !!! - SBGK 12:04:01 09/10/13 (2)
- 2.31 sse4 intel. Found it. It's there now. (NT) - hfavandepas 12:43:27 09/10/13 (0)
- uploaded 2.31 sse4 intel. Do I look at the correct place? - hfavandepas 12:41:16 09/10/13 (0)
- RE: Whow, I wasn't repaired for this. What a SUPERB sound quality !!! - SBGK 11:14:20 09/10/13 (27)
- just downloaded 180 day trail version Windows Server 2012 - hfavandepas 12:34:15 09/10/13 (26)
- RE: just downloaded 180 day trail version Windows Server 2012 - SBGK 12:42:09 09/10/13 (25)
- Thank you. Lets see if I can get 2012 up and running (NT) - hfavandepas 12:46:06 09/10/13 (24)
- RE: Thank you. Lets see if I can get 2012 up and running (NT) - SBGK 14:59:21 09/10/13 (20)
- RE: Thank you. Lets see if I can get 2012 up and running (NT) - SBGK 15:18:58 09/10/13 (19)
- 2.31 sse4 intel r9 and r11 - hfavandepas 12:02:36 09/11/13 (18)
- RE: 2.31 sse4 intel r9 and r11 - SBGK 14:22:05 09/11/13 (16)
- RE: 2.31 sse4 intel r9 and r11 - jpechloe 21:43:18 09/20/13 (15)
- RE: 2.31 sse4 intel r9 and r11 - SBGK 12:33:49 09/22/13 (14)
- RE: 2.44 sse4 intel - jpechloe 15:04:19 09/22/13 (13)
- RE: 2.44 sse4 intel - SBGK 15:25:07 09/23/13 (12)
- Let's continue here - hfavandepas 11:31:26 10/07/13 (11)
- RE: Let's continue here - SBGK 11:42:52 10/07/13 (10)
- RE: Let's continue here - sligolad 13:25:58 10/07/13 (6)
- RE: Let's continue here - goon-heaven 13:36:43 10/07/13 (5)
- RE: Let's continue here - SBGK 13:52:08 10/07/13 (2)
- RE: Let's continue here - John Dot 14:06:42 10/07/13 (1)
- RE: Let's continue here - jpechloe 21:34:55 10/07/13 (0)
- RE: Let's continue here - John Dot 13:49:23 10/07/13 (0)
- RE: Let's continue here - Ken Moreland 13:45:59 10/07/13 (0)
- RE: Let's continue here - OntarioHiFi 11:50:13 10/07/13 (2)
- Is it safe? - goon-heaven 13:13:30 10/07/13 (1)
- RE: Is it safe? - SBGK 13:25:11 10/07/13 (0)
- RE: 2.31 sse4 intel r9 and r11 - SBGK 12:05:18 09/11/13 (0)
- RE: Thank you. Lets see if I can get 2012 up and running (NT) - SBGK 13:22:07 09/10/13 (0)
- RE: Thank you. Lets see if I can get 2012 up and running (NT) - SBGK 13:12:19 09/10/13 (0)
- RE: Thank you. Lets see if I can get 2012 up and running (NT) - SBGK 12:56:59 09/10/13 (0)