In Reply to: RE: ZFS / btrfs article...... & video clip posted by AbeCollins on August 14, 2012 at 16:28:07:
I am still a big fan of XFS. It is still undergoing a very active development, especially in recent linux kernels.
Our backup server has hundreds of millions of files (mostly hardlinks), collected over almost 10 years of operation. That filesystem has grown with the hardware, throughout the years has resided on many linux raids of different configurations.
Accidentally this morning one of the drives in that server array died, input/output error even for simple "cat /dev/sdd". A new one is already synchronizing (those missing slots are for two rotating sets of offline backup drives, synchronized once a week in external eSATA bays):
orfeus:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [raid0]
md6 : active raid1 md4[0]
2178180728 blocks super 1.0 [2/1] [U_]
md4 : active raid0 sdd3[1] sdb1[0]
2178180864 blocks 64k chunks
md7 : active raid1 md6[2] md5[1]
2178180592 blocks super 1.0 [2/1] [_U]
[========>............] recovery = 40.0% (871529608/2178180592) finish=316.5min speed=68788K/sec
md5 : active raid1 md3[0]
2178180728 blocks super 1.0 [2/1] [U_]
bitmap: 9/9 pages [36KB], 131072KB chunk
md3 : active raid0 sda1[0] sdc3[1]
2178180864 blocks 64k chunks
md2 : active raid1 sdd2[1] sdc2[0]
8787456 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md1 : active raid1 sdd1[1] sdc1[0]
10739328 blocks [5/2] [UU___]
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: ZFS / btrfs article...... & video clip - phofman 10:18:29 08/15/12 (0)