In Reply to: RE: As I read Tony's post, he would agree with you posted by esande on July 7, 2012 at 14:49:17:
Here, in a nutshell, is what I said
1. An owner can make a copy for personal use only. The law permits that.
2. An owner can sell an origininal. The law permits that.
3. An owner may not make a copy and then sell either the copy or the original.
That's what I said, and nothing more.
If a buyer has reason to believe that the seller is selling a copy or an original and keeping the other, then the buyer has a duty to avoid the transaction, just like he would have a duty to avoid buying a car he knew was stolen. I figured that was obvious, but it's not what Tony and I were discussing.
Feel better?
___
"If you are the owner of a new stereophonic system, this record will play with even more brilliant true-to-life fidelity. In short, you can purchase this record with no fear of its becoming obsolete in the future."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I never said that - JoshT 15:25:55 07/07/12 (2)
- RE: I never said that - esande 15:47:59 07/07/12 (1)
- Yes, I believe you are required to - JoshT 17:53:51 07/07/12 (0)