In Reply to: RE: Reminder... posted by Scrith on March 23, 2012 at 18:21:30:
It's not clear that what people are hearing is related to jitter. Indeed, it's not clear what these people are hearing.
Some of these people are using very high end DACs that are supposedly designed to be highly immune to incoming jitter through the design of their clock circuitry.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Reminder... - Tony Lauck 12:30:25 03/24/12 (9)
- RE: Reminder... - fmak 11:05:51 03/25/12 (8)
- RE: Reminder... - Tony Lauck 12:36:25 03/25/12 (7)
- RE: Reminder... - rick_m 09:07:24 03/26/12 (6)
- Single Clock Domain. Otherwise madness! - Tony Lauck 10:37:50 03/26/12 (5)
- RE: Single Clock Domain. Otherwise madness! - rick_m 08:36:48 03/28/12 (3)
- RE: Single Clock Domain. Otherwise madness! - Tony Lauck 09:40:45 03/28/12 (2)
- RE: Single Clock Domain. Otherwise madness! - rick_m 07:48:38 03/29/12 (1)
- RE: Single Clock Domain. Otherwise madness! - Tony Lauck 08:14:15 03/29/12 (0)
- RE: Single Clock Domain. Otherwise madness! - rick_m 17:52:12 03/26/12 (0)