|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
|
|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: Re: software upsampling add dynamics? posted by Presto on October 30, 2006 at 13:41:14:
Hi Presto> when using foobar, I prefer to do no upsampling *IF* I am doing convolution or PC crossover plugins. If not doing convolution, then using the PC for crossover functions is fine - quite good sounding actually.
~ Due to over high demands on the processor, causing pops etc?> If doing convolution, I prefer to use outboard passive crossovers (or at least an outboard digitial active crossover). It seems that once you start doing more and more *different* digital processes (aka plugins) it seems the "effect" of doing all this processing seems to be cumulative.
Another approach is room correction with a Behringer DEQ2496 street price $300??
www.behringer.com/DEQ2496/index.cfm?lang=ENG
which would free up resources for other things> Upsampling seems to have a high "penalty to performance" ratio at the best of times, where convolution offers far greater benefits and a surprisingly low penalty.
Is the penalty ~ pops etc?Cheers
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Dedicating resources - rick57 21:07:58 10/30/06 (3)
- Re: Dedicating resources - aljordan 05:05:26 10/31/06 (2)
- " . . with time and phase as DRC does - rick57 02:20:13 11/03/06 (1)
- Re: " . . with time and phase as DRC does - aljordan 12:06:47 11/03/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
