It is many years since I was seriously involved in PC programming so I may have forgotten, or things may have changed radically, BUTmy understanding of DLLs is that they are shar(ed)(eable) libraries of routines.
A given DLL will be loaded by the first app that requires it. Other apps that need it will check that it is there before loading another copy.
I am not sure what is responsible for unloading DLLs when they are no longer required but, logically, there must be a DLL manager in the OS.
Once loaded a DLL doesn't DO anything, ie doesn't consume processor unless a routine is being called. Even then I cannot see any difference between the routine being in the DLL or the main .EXE
Basically it sits there lurking in memory .....
So why the expressed concern about seeking and destroying all DLLs?
What am I misunderstanding / missing?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Concern about .DLLs - clifff 13:06:15 08/22/06 (55)
- DLL Hell - jbmcb 14:11:50 08/24/06 (14)
- Don't want to be nitpicking, but ... - Christine Tham 15:17:17 08/24/06 (6)
- I like nitpicking, it's my hobby :) - jbmcb 10:59:06 08/25/06 (5)
- Well, here's some more :-) - Christine Tham 16:36:57 08/25/06 (4)
- Weee! :) - jbmcb 00:09:02 08/27/06 (3)
- Re: Weee! :) - Christine Tham 17:43:27 08/27/06 (2)
- Re: Weee! :) - jbmcb 19:29:08 08/27/06 (1)
- Re: Weee! :) - Christine Tham 19:56:19 08/27/06 (0)
- Thanks! Detailed and clear. nt - clifff 14:46:37 08/24/06 (6)
- indeed, however, pretty much what I have been saying all along... can we now lay this nonsens to rest please? Thanks! - danny kaey 15:00:36 08/24/06 (5)
- See my other post - Christine Tham 15:21:30 08/24/06 (4)
- "It's easy to dismiss something... you don't fully understand." And highly enjoyable too! nt - clarkjohnsen 08:43:35 08/25/06 (0)
- Re: See my other post - Dawnrazor 16:38:45 08/24/06 (2)
- Possible - Christine Tham 16:51:10 08/24/06 (1)
- Re: Possible - Dawnrazor 17:12:40 08/24/06 (0)
- you need to understand how an operating system works - danny kaey 20:54:08 08/22/06 (12)
- Re: you need to understand how an operating system works - fmak 03:43:59 08/24/06 (4)
- DOo you really expect a forum on computers and software - clifff 07:55:27 08/24/06 (3)
- Re: DOo you really expect a forum on computers and software - fmak 11:11:41 08/24/06 (2)
- How do you think you get your audio without a PC and software!? nt - clifff 11:27:48 08/24/06 (1)
- Re: How do you think you get your audio without a PC and software!? nt - fmak 12:24:15 08/24/06 (0)
- I do, and I was NOT expressing concern! nt - clifff 04:49:38 08/23/06 (6)
- "So why the expressed concern about seeking and destroying all DLLs?" - danny kaey 07:59:11 08/23/06 (5)
- I was referring to several threads below, plus - clifff 10:21:19 08/23/06 (2)
- 'oki 'doki - danny kaey 15:16:32 08/23/06 (0)
- Now my PS (!) - clifff 10:24:10 08/23/06 (0)
- PS: that's a quote from your opening statement - danny kaey 08:00:30 08/23/06 (1)
- Re: PS: that's a quote from your opening statement - Dawnrazor 16:49:31 08/25/06 (0)
- Completely unfounded and unproven IMHO - Scrith 13:39:39 08/22/06 (25)
- Not completely unfounded and unproven, but certainly misrepresented - Christine Tham 21:45:04 08/22/06 (24)
- True - Scrith 23:08:50 08/22/06 (1)
- I *was* being a bit of a devil's advocate ... - Christine Tham 01:39:34 08/23/06 (0)
- WinXP has in excess of 50 million lines of code - danny kaey 22:16:28 08/22/06 (21)
- Re: WinXP has in excess of 50 million lines of code - fmak 03:51:11 08/24/06 (20)
- Re: WinXP has in excess of 50 million lines of code - KeithC 08:32:24 08/24/06 (19)
- Re: WinXP has in excess of 50 million lines of code - fmak 12:28:47 08/24/06 (18)
- Re: WinXP has in excess of 50 million lines of code - KeithC 15:34:51 08/24/06 (17)
- it does have )50 million lines of code - danny kaey 15:41:39 08/24/06 (16)
- Re: it does have )50 million lines of code - KeithC 15:57:53 08/24/06 (15)
- no matter how you slice and dice, Windows is bloated beyond belief - danny kaey 16:02:58 08/24/06 (14)
- Re: no matter how you slice and dice, Windows is bloated beyond belief - KeithC 16:22:35 08/24/06 (13)
- I agree, but there's no point continuing the conversation ... - Christine Tham 17:08:35 08/24/06 (12)
- Re: I agree, but there's no point continuing the conversation ... - KeithC 18:05:41 08/24/06 (11)
- Yeah, isn't it amazing - Christine Tham 19:06:05 08/24/06 (10)
- I never understood why MS didn't go the route of an emulator ala Rosetta - danny kaey 19:26:42 08/24/06 (9)
- Re: I never understood why MS didn't go the route of an emulator ala Rosetta - Christine Tham 19:58:21 08/24/06 (8)
- f00ls!!! - danny kaey 20:22:32 08/24/06 (7)
- Re: f00ls!!! - KeithC 00:04:54 08/25/06 (6)
- Re: f00ls!!! - fmak 00:19:31 08/25/06 (5)
- Re: f00ls!!! - KeithC 05:06:09 08/25/06 (0)
- Sheesh! Only 30 years??? What a young pup! - Christine Tham 01:47:12 08/25/06 (3)
- Re: Sheesh! Only 30 years??? What a young pup! - fmak 10:50:44 08/25/06 (0)
- Re: Sheesh! Only 30 years??? What a young pup! - Mercman 10:18:09 08/25/06 (0)
- Re: Sheesh! Only 30 years??? What a young pup! - KeithC 03:47:10 08/25/06 (0)