In Reply to: more or less posted by Ralph on May 8, 2012 at 10:27:02:
Perhaps I did not make myself clear; I was speculating that one might use some sort of RC network at the input, to contour the response curve of the direct-drive amp so that it would complement the response curve of the ESL. I was not thinking about coupling caps in the conventional sense of the word.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: more or less - Lew 20:24:17 05/08/12 (25)
- You were plenty clear enough - Ralph 09:34:55 05/09/12 (24)
- This is hypothetical..., - Lew 11:07:51 05/09/12 (23)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - Ralph 12:19:57 05/09/12 (22)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - Lew 18:39:54 05/09/12 (21)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - Ralph 09:17:22 05/10/12 (20)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - KIS 15:07:20 05/10/12 (3)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - tyu 06:11:13 05/11/12 (2)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - Ralph 10:57:46 05/11/12 (1)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - tyu 13:40:10 05/11/12 (0)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - Lew 15:04:55 05/10/12 (15)
- balanced input on that would be easy. nt - Ralph 20:03:24 05/10/12 (13)
- RE: balanced input on that would be easy. nt - Lew 16:28:10 05/11/12 (12)
- can we get just a tad more to the left in that photo? nt - Ralph 12:14:30 05/15/12 (8)
- Here you go... - Lew 19:24:52 05/15/12 (7)
- much better - Lew 19:37:51 05/15/12 (6)
- And more better - Lew 19:38:52 05/15/12 (5)
- RE: And more better - Ralph 08:31:56 05/16/12 (4)
- RE: And more better - Lew 11:43:56 05/16/12 (3)
- RE: And more better - Ralph 12:22:07 05/16/12 (2)
- Designer = Roger Modjeski - Lew 12:40:33 05/16/12 (1)
- RE: Designer = Roger Modjeski - tyu 05:23:09 06/11/12 (0)
- RE: balanced input on that would be easy. nt - tyu 07:58:37 05/12/12 (2)
- RE: balanced input on that would be easy. nt - Lew 10:26:41 05/12/12 (1)
- RE: balanced input on that would be easy. nt - tyu 11:58:08 05/12/12 (0)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - KIS 15:46:56 05/10/12 (0)