In Reply to: RE: Addendum posted by Ralph on April 26, 2012 at 13:42:00:
Ralph
With all due respect, I heard it and you did not, therefore the comment.
But I see your theoretical point of view.
Will
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Addendum - KIS 16:44:07 04/26/12 (13)
- RE: Addendum - Lew 12:14:02 04/27/12 (0)
- RE: Addendum - Ralph 09:12:28 04/27/12 (11)
- RE: Addendum - KIS 10:16:23 04/27/12 (10)
- RE: Addendum - tyu 12:22:51 04/27/12 (6)
- RE: Addendum - KIS 19:10:40 04/27/12 (5)
- RE: Addendum - tyu 05:51:54 04/28/12 (2)
- RE: Addendum - KIS 18:32:51 04/28/12 (0)
- Very interesting ideas - Lew 08:40:24 04/28/12 (0)
- RE: Addendum - Ralph 20:38:23 04/27/12 (1)
- RE: Addendum - KIS 21:13:55 04/27/12 (0)
- RE: Addendum - Lew 12:03:35 04/27/12 (1)
- RE: Addendum - KIS 18:35:50 04/27/12 (0)
- RE: Addendum - Ralph 10:36:16 04/27/12 (0)